06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

k<br />

2d<br />

m b<br />

j = , (7)<br />

lb<br />

2d<br />

m<br />

k<br />

b<br />

+<br />

+ l<br />

k<br />

m<br />

where lb is the CB thickness. In addition, dlm in Equation (6) is replaced by m b , the<br />

center to center distance (see Figure 7.4b). The presence <strong>of</strong> k<br />

d + l / 2<br />

b -1 in the denominator <strong>of</strong><br />

Equation (7) results in kj < km. It is in this way that the permeability-barrier effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CBs enters the matrix-CB transmissibility <strong>and</strong> thus the flow equations. For flow between<br />

two CB control volumes, Equation (6) is again applied, with quantities as defined in<br />

Figure 7.4c. We note that permeability anisotropy in the CBs (i.e., different permeability<br />

along <strong>and</strong> across the b<strong>and</strong>s) could be readily modeled within the current formulation,<br />

though this is not necessary here because CB permeability is assumed to be isotropic.<br />

Writing the discrete mass balance ( q + q + q = −Qˆ<br />

) for each cell, <strong>and</strong> expressing the qj<br />

1<br />

2<br />

via Equation (5), gives the finite volume representation for Equation (1). Solution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resulting linear system provides the cell-center pressure unknowns.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> two-phase flow, finite volume discretization <strong>of</strong> Equations (2) <strong>and</strong> (3)<br />

entails mass conservation statements for each component (phase). The net flux out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

control volume in this case is balanced by both the source <strong>and</strong> accumulation terms. The<br />

flux <strong>of</strong> a particular phase (e.g., water) across edge j is now given by:<br />

w<br />

w w<br />

q = λ T ( p − p )<br />

(8)<br />

j<br />

w<br />

j<br />

l<br />

m<br />

w<br />

w<br />

where λw is the upstream-weighted phase mobility (λw = krw/µw) <strong>and</strong> p <strong>and</strong> p are the<br />

water pressures in blocks l <strong>and</strong> m. The transmissibility Tj<br />

is the same for both phases <strong>and</strong><br />

is again given by Equation (6). Expressing the discrete mass balances for each component<br />

using Equation (8) <strong>and</strong> introducing time discretizations for the accumulation terms<br />

provides the finite volume representation. Pressure <strong>and</strong> saturation for each cell at each<br />

time step can then be computed.<br />

3<br />

The two-point flux approximation described above is applied for all connections. This<br />

is strictly valid only when the grid is “orthogonal,” which in this context means that dlm<br />

(the line connecting the two cell centers) is orthogonal to the shared interface.<br />

Nonorthogonality (or full-tensor effects, not an issue here since permeability is taken as<br />

179<br />

l<br />

m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!