structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
confining pressures produce, in my opinion, a failure phenomenon distinct from<br />
compaction b<strong>and</strong>ing as observed in outcrop.<br />
The greater value <strong>of</strong> my fledgling laboratory efforts probably lies in the collaborative<br />
relationships developed within the experimental community pursuing compaction<br />
localization research. I visited <strong>and</strong> worked in the labs <strong>of</strong> Bezalel Haimson (University <strong>of</strong><br />
Wisconsin-Madison), William Olsson <strong>and</strong> David Holcomb (S<strong>and</strong>ia National Labs) <strong>and</strong><br />
David Lockner (USGS-Menlo Park), <strong>and</strong> corresponded extensively with the laboratory <strong>of</strong><br />
Teng-fong Wong (Stony Brook University). Through these interactions <strong>and</strong> a DOE-<br />
sponsored workshop (October 2004), which led directly to my association with co-author<br />
John Rudnicki (Chapters 2 <strong>and</strong> 3), David Pollard <strong>and</strong> I have introduced a much-needed<br />
field-based reality check into compaction localization experimentation. Whether this<br />
influence will become more tangible through my own future experimental efforts remains<br />
to be seen.<br />
Finally, I would be remiss in not observing that, although a strong process-based<br />
<strong>mechanics</strong> perspective <strong>and</strong> approach pervade this thesis, it is based primarily on<br />
observations made from outcrops <strong>and</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone. While this fact<br />
does not detract from my results <strong>and</strong> interpretations, the issue <strong>of</strong> ubiquity is relevant from<br />
a practical applications st<strong>and</strong>point. That is, are CB arrays such as observed in the Aztec<br />
common in s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifers <strong>and</strong> reservoirs, or are they a relative freak <strong>of</strong> nature? From<br />
a fundamental physical <strong>and</strong> mechanical point <strong>of</strong> view, it is unlikely that CBs in the Aztec<br />
represent an isolated phenomenological fluke. However, shear deformation b<strong>and</strong>s have<br />
been observed in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> clastic deposits exposed around the world, <strong>and</strong> similar<br />
observations <strong>of</strong> CBs are needed to confirm them as a common structure in porous<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stone.<br />
Beyond this obvious direction for future analog reservoir-based fieldwork, a<br />
concerted effort also is needed to develop borehole geophysical methods for detecting<br />
<strong>and</strong> characterizing deformation b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> all types in the subsurface. The general<br />
petrophysical attributes <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s should, in theory at least, render them visible to a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> imaging technologies, ranging from acoustic to electromagnetic. In conjunction<br />
with a solid mechanical underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> how CBs <strong>and</strong> CB arrays form—the foundations<br />
for which are laid here in Chapters 1 through 4—such imaging techniques would provide<br />
7