06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

out in positive relief as distinct fins (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2005; Mollema <strong>and</strong> Antonellini, 1996)<br />

(Figure 7.2). Millimeters to centimeters thick <strong>and</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> meters in planar extent, CBs<br />

represent a kinematic end member <strong>of</strong> the suite <strong>of</strong> structures known collectively as<br />

deformation b<strong>and</strong>s, which also includes shear <strong>and</strong> dilation b<strong>and</strong>s (Aydin, 1978;<br />

Antonellini et al., 1994; Mollema <strong>and</strong> Antonellini, 1996; Du Bernard et al., 2002). The<br />

petrophysical changes accommodating mechanical compaction inside CBs, in conjunction<br />

with subsequent preferential cementation, can reduce porosity within the b<strong>and</strong>s to a few<br />

percent. Decreased porosity, <strong>and</strong> corresponding reductions in pore throat diameter <strong>and</strong><br />

connectivity, can in turn reduce saturated permeability within the b<strong>and</strong>s by 1 to 4 orders<br />

<strong>of</strong> magnitude relative to that <strong>of</strong> the surrounding host rock (Pittman, 1981; Freeman, 1990;<br />

Antonellini <strong>and</strong> Aydin, 1994; Crawford, 1998; Gibson, 1998; Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 2000;<br />

Sigda <strong>and</strong> Wilson, 2003).<br />

Permeability anisotropy due to depositional bedding in the Aztec <strong>and</strong> Navajo<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stones is generally less than a factor <strong>of</strong> two (Freeman, 1990; Antonellini <strong>and</strong> Aydin,<br />

1994; Flodin et al., 2005), minimal when compared to the reduced permeability<br />

represented by the CBs. There is no data to suggest that significant anisotropy related to<br />

bedding persists inside the b<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> no reason to expect that the consequences <strong>of</strong> any<br />

such remnant anisotropy would be significant. In the analyses to follow, we therefore<br />

make the simplifying assumption <strong>of</strong> homogeneous, isotropic permeability for both the<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> the CBs.<br />

3. Mapping<br />

The fins <strong>of</strong> CBs cropping out in the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone are plainly visible in low-altitude<br />

aerial photographs. A high-resolution (3,000 dpi) digital scan made from one such<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard (23 cm x 23 cm) aerial photo color negative reveals an extensive exposure <strong>of</strong><br />

nearly continuous Aztec outcrops at a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:2,400 (Figure 7.1). This scan captured a<br />

level <strong>of</strong> detail down to the grain <strong>of</strong> the negative, producing a digital image with a pixel<br />

dimension relative to outcrop <strong>of</strong> about 2 cm. Loading this image into Adobe Illustrator®<br />

<strong>and</strong> enlarging it, we were able to recognize <strong>and</strong> trace individual cm-thick CBs (or in many<br />

cases, closely space clusters <strong>of</strong> CBs) for tens to hundreds <strong>of</strong> meters (Figure 7.1, inset<br />

photos). This photo mapping effort was guided by our familiarity with the appearance <strong>of</strong><br />

CBs in outcrop <strong>and</strong> was checked extensively in the field.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!