06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Relative Effective Permeability<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard (2000)<br />

Numerical Model<br />

Harmonic Average<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Volume Fraction Deformation B<strong>and</strong>s (%)<br />

Figure 6.10. Isotropic effective permeability for cross-hatch patterns <strong>of</strong> evenly spaced,<br />

perpendicular DB sets as a function <strong>of</strong> DB volume fraction for the DB/s<strong>and</strong>stone matrix<br />

permeability ratio <strong>of</strong> 10 -2 . Results from the finite difference-finite element method used<br />

in this paper (FD-FE) modeling are plotted against both the analytical approximation <strong>of</strong><br />

Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard (2000) <strong>and</strong> the permeability computed normal to just one <strong>of</strong> the DB<br />

sets using the harmonic averaging method. The FD-FE <strong>and</strong> harmonic averaging methods<br />

agree well over the entire volume fraction range, while the approximation holds only for<br />

volume fractions up to about 5%. The range <strong>of</strong> DB volume fraction observed in the Aztec<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone is highlighted in gray.<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!