structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
hooking-tip interactions—using the BEM code. The degree <strong>of</strong> success attained suggests<br />
that the linear elastic anticrack mechanical model provides a valid first approximation for<br />
conceptualizing <strong>and</strong> simulating CB <strong>propagation</strong>. Perhaps the most interesting <strong>and</strong><br />
potentially useful result <strong>of</strong> this paper is the model observation that anticrack CBs respond<br />
to high compressive normal stress (σ2 ≈ σ1) oriented parallel to their trend with<br />
<strong>propagation</strong>-path instability. This is opposite to the instability effect observed for<br />
opening-mode cracks (Olson <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 1989; Thomas <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 1993), <strong>and</strong> could be<br />
used to help forecast the degree <strong>of</strong> anastomosis in subsurface CB arrays as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
stress history. By the same token, the configuration <strong>of</strong> an exhumed CB array could be<br />
used to constrain the ambient principal paleostress state (orientation <strong>and</strong> magnitude) in<br />
which it formed. For this paper, I performed all the fieldwork, modeling, writing <strong>and</strong><br />
figure drafting, with guidance <strong>and</strong> editing provided by second-author David Pollard. For<br />
the modeling, I used the BEM code written by third-author Gaurav Chopra (Chapter 2).<br />
Submission <strong>of</strong> a final manuscript based on Chapter 4 to Journal <strong>of</strong> Structural Geology is<br />
anticipated.<br />
Chapter 5 represents another outgrowth <strong>of</strong> my collaborative efforts, in this case with<br />
Tapan Mukerji <strong>and</strong> Youngseuk Keehm <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Stanford</strong> Rock Physics <strong>and</strong> Borehole<br />
Geophysics (SRB) Group. I had gone to Mukerji for help in using MATLAB® to<br />
perform automated image-analysis measurements <strong>of</strong> porosity from my thin-sections, the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> which contributed to every other chapter in this thesis. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fluid-flow modeling presented in Chapter 7, I had also contemplated collecting<br />
permeability measurements, but was dissuaded by the difficulty <strong>of</strong> obtaining reliable<br />
results from thin CBs at reasonable expense. Through Mukerji, however, I learned <strong>of</strong> the<br />
computational permeability estimation algorithm that had been developed in the SRB,<br />
principally by Keehm, <strong>and</strong> could be used to generate virtual permeability measurements<br />
from my existing thin sections. I recognized the opportunity to perform a practical test <strong>of</strong><br />
this new tool within the context <strong>of</strong> the analog reservoir research concept. Specifically, we<br />
applied the method to my prize thin section <strong>and</strong> compared the estimation results to<br />
available permeability measurement data for both CBs <strong>and</strong> host rock from the Aztec <strong>and</strong><br />
Navajo s<strong>and</strong>stones. Correspondence was excellent, suggesting that, for a subsurface<br />
equivalent <strong>of</strong> the CB-rich Aztec from which only scarce, potentially unconsolidated<br />
4