06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

did not report permeability values for individual b<strong>and</strong>s, Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard (2000) used<br />

his data to estimate that average DB permeability is about 2.3 orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude less<br />

than in the host rock. Gibson (1998) found that the permeability <strong>of</strong> DBs depends on the<br />

clay content <strong>of</strong> the parent s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> can vary from 1 to 4 orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude, with<br />

an average value <strong>of</strong> ~2.2 orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />

4. Characteristic DB patterns in the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone<br />

The Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire State Park lies about 60 km northeast <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas <strong>and</strong> about 30<br />

km west <strong>of</strong> the Utah border (Figure 6.1). The predominant outcrop unit within the park is<br />

the Jurassic Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone, commonly considered correlative with the Navajo<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone. The Aztec is an æolian, subarkosic s<strong>and</strong>stone up to 2 km thick typified by<br />

large-scale cross-bed sets up to 10+ meters thick (Marzolf, 1983; Myers, 1999). The<br />

Aztec has a mean grain size <strong>of</strong> about 0.25 mm, an average porosity <strong>of</strong> around 20%<br />

(Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 2000) <strong>and</strong> an average matrix permeability ranging from 0.1 to 1.0<br />

darcys (Antonellini <strong>and</strong> Aydin, 1994; Myers, 1999). The Aztec exhibits a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

brittle <strong>structural</strong> fabrics that include DBs, joints <strong>and</strong> faults, with DBs consistently<br />

appearing to be the oldest features (Hill, 1989; Myers, 1999; Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 2000).<br />

Hill (1989) hypothesized that DB formation within the Aztec was related to widespread<br />

compression during emplacement <strong>of</strong> the Summit/Willow Tank <strong>and</strong> Muddy Mountain<br />

thrusts during the Early Cretaceous Sevier orogeny.<br />

Fieldwork in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire has revealed at least three wide spread, systematic <strong>and</strong><br />

volumetrically significant patterns <strong>of</strong> dominantly compactive DBs in the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone<br />

over an area <strong>of</strong> more than 10 km 2 . All <strong>of</strong> these characteristic patterns—parallel, cross-<br />

hatch <strong>and</strong> anastomosing—have previously been described at various locations, though<br />

generally using different nomenclature (Antonellini <strong>and</strong> Aydin, 1994, 1995; Aydin <strong>and</strong><br />

Reches, 1982; Burhannudinnur <strong>and</strong> Morley, 1997; Davis, 1998; Hill, 1989; Jamison <strong>and</strong><br />

Stearns, 1982; Mollema <strong>and</strong> Antonellini, 1996; Taylor <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 2000; Underhill <strong>and</strong><br />

Woodcock, 1987; Woodcock <strong>and</strong> Underhill, 1987). Within the Aztec, the 2-D density <strong>of</strong><br />

DBs exposed in any given outcrop (area DBs/outcrop area) ranges from ~1% up to ~20%.<br />

Assuming reasonable continuity in the third dimension, as is clearly suggested by field<br />

observations in outcrop areas <strong>of</strong> high relief, the volume percent density <strong>of</strong> DBs also<br />

ranges between 1% <strong>and</strong> 20%.<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!