06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esults therefore suggest that the generally anastomosing pattern <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s<br />

captured in the x1-x2 plane would appear as a more consistently parallel, less<br />

interconnected pattern in the x1-x3 plane (Figure 4.24). This interpretation has<br />

yet to be confirmed by observing outcrop exposures with the requisite<br />

orientation, which are rare at best.<br />

4. Strongly parallel b<strong>and</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> in the x1-x3 plane would tend also to retard<br />

CB interactions in the x1-x2 plane. Given the degree <strong>of</strong> anastomosis<br />

nonetheless present in Aztec outcrops, this suggest that the paleo state <strong>of</strong><br />

stress in the x1-x2 plane was likely more nearly isotropic than our 2-D<br />

simulations suggest.<br />

5. These interrelationships <strong>of</strong> magnitude <strong>and</strong> direction between the components<br />

<strong>of</strong> principal paleo stress <strong>and</strong> the resulting patterns <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> have<br />

significant implications for predicting 3-D permeability in aquifers <strong>and</strong><br />

reservoirs containing CBs. Specifically, because permeability along the trend<br />

<strong>of</strong> a b<strong>and</strong> pattern decreases with increasing connectivity, <strong>and</strong> the minimum<br />

principal permeability (k3 ≤ k2 ≤ k1) is directed orthogonal to the dominant<br />

b<strong>and</strong> orientation (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2004), k1 due to a subsurface b<strong>and</strong> array will<br />

parallel the presumed direction <strong>of</strong> paleo σ33 r , k2 will parallel σ22 r <strong>and</strong> k3 will<br />

parallel σ11 r (Figure 4.24). The relative magnitudes <strong>of</strong> the principal<br />

permeabilities can likewise be inferred from the presumed relative magnitudes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the paleo principal stresses.<br />

6. By the same token, the orientations <strong>and</strong> relative magnitudes <strong>of</strong> all three<br />

principal paleo stresses can be inferred from directional variations observed in<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> anastomosis revealed by a well-exposed (or imaged) CB array.<br />

8. Acknowledgements<br />

We are deeply indebted to John Childs for his ever cheerful <strong>and</strong> able assistance in the<br />

field, <strong>and</strong> thank Ovunc Mutlu for help with the numerical code. This work was funded by<br />

the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Office <strong>of</strong> Basic Energy Science, Geosciences Research<br />

Program under grant DE-FG03-94ER14462, awarded to David Pollard <strong>and</strong> Atilla Aydin<br />

at <strong>Stanford</strong> University. Additional support was provided by the <strong>Stanford</strong> Rock Fracture<br />

Project.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!