06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when the ambient stress state is nearly isotropic <strong>and</strong>/or b<strong>and</strong>s are spaced less than a meter<br />

apart.<br />

One other factor mentioned in the section on mechanical theory as a potential<br />

influence on the <strong>propagation</strong> paths <strong>of</strong> interacting CBs is the effective drag or “inertia”<br />

imposed by their pre-existing length. As a test <strong>of</strong> the general validity <strong>of</strong> this notion, we<br />

undertook a series <strong>of</strong> three simulations identical in every respect except for the initial<br />

lengths <strong>of</strong> the model b<strong>and</strong>s: two 25-m b<strong>and</strong>s (as above <strong>and</strong> in Figure 4.21), one 25 m<br />

b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> one 5 m b<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> two 5 m b<strong>and</strong>s. In order to ensure adequate space <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>propagation</strong> reactivity to render variations in path distinguishable on a single plot, a<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> 2 m <strong>and</strong> an isotropic remote stress state were chosen (Figure 4.22). When both<br />

b<strong>and</strong>s are 25 m long, their mutual influence is substantially similar to that when spacing<br />

is 2.5 m. When one b<strong>and</strong> is 5 m long, its impact on the continued <strong>propagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

longer b<strong>and</strong> is perceptibly diminished, both in terms <strong>of</strong> the initial repulsion <strong>and</strong> the<br />

subsequent attraction. The effect <strong>of</strong> the longer b<strong>and</strong> on the shorter one, however, is even<br />

more noticeably enhanced. When both b<strong>and</strong>s are 5 m long, their responses again mirror<br />

each other, but are completely different from either <strong>of</strong> the first two cases. In particular,<br />

they initially repel <strong>and</strong> attract each other somewhat less robustly than the pair <strong>of</strong> 25-m-<br />

long b<strong>and</strong>s, but, at the point when parallel <strong>propagation</strong> resumes in both earlier examples,<br />

attraction between the shorter b<strong>and</strong>s re-intensifies <strong>and</strong> they propagate toward intersection<br />

at a relatively high angle <strong>of</strong> approach (> 30°). The final path has a slight hitch in it that<br />

produces a mild, s-shaped curvature. This simple example demonstrates both that b<strong>and</strong><br />

length can influence the strength <strong>of</strong> tip interactions, <strong>and</strong> that the most general case<br />

involving different length b<strong>and</strong>s interacting is likely to produce noticeably asymmetric<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> hooking.<br />

Finally, we note that, although the simulations presented in Figures 4.21 <strong>and</strong> 4.22<br />

generally predict the resumption <strong>of</strong> parallel <strong>propagation</strong> paths following initial overlap,<br />

the normalized magnitude <strong>of</strong> σθθ max rapidly drops toward one. This suggests that, for any<br />

reasonable critical threshold value, <strong>propagation</strong> would cease. Outcrop observations,<br />

however, demonstrate that long, sub-parallel overlaps between b<strong>and</strong>s spaced even<br />

millimeters apart are common.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!