06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To determine the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> path to the choice <strong>of</strong> r, we performed a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> stability tests using the same model b<strong>and</strong> that produced Figures 4.16 <strong>and</strong> 17. We<br />

added a 2-cm element to one tip at a variable kink angle <strong>of</strong> α, <strong>and</strong> plotted the relationship<br />

between α <strong>and</strong> the angle at which the next increment <strong>of</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> was predicted to<br />

occur (β) for r = 1, 5 <strong>and</strong> 10 mm, <strong>and</strong> the bracketing remote differential stress magnitudes<br />

(σ d = σ11 r -σ22 r ) <strong>of</strong> zero <strong>and</strong> 0.5 (Figure 4.18). The response in every case is to correct the<br />

deviation such that β is negative for positive α along a nearly linear trend. When the<br />

remote stress state is isotropic, |β| ≤ |α| <strong>and</strong> symmetry with σ11 r is nearly restored with the<br />

next increment <strong>of</strong> <strong>propagation</strong>. When σ d is the maximum <strong>of</strong> 0.5, |β| ≥ |α| <strong>and</strong> the next<br />

increment <strong>of</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> over-corrects for the original deviation. The effect <strong>of</strong> varying r<br />

at the two stress states is also opposite: for σ d = 0, |β| varies directly with r; for σ d = 0.5,<br />

|β| varies inversely with r. Discarding r = 1 mm as unrealistically small for the reasons<br />

stated above, we observe that β never varies by more than 4° for a given α between r = 5<br />

mm <strong>and</strong> r = 10 mm. Due to this limited effect, <strong>and</strong> to preserve the plausibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

linear elastic continuum assumption, we chose r = 5 mm for all simulations.<br />

Finally, as the model uses linear segments to approximate CB paths that generally are<br />

smoothly curving, we examined the stability <strong>of</strong> the <strong>propagation</strong> direction as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

the dislocation element length used. Naturally, the shorter the elements, the better the<br />

model fit to the ideal (i.e. smooth) path. As a practical matter <strong>of</strong> computational efficiency,<br />

however, longer elements are desirable. We performed a second suite <strong>of</strong> kink-angle<br />

stability tests for tip-element lengths <strong>of</strong> 2, 6 <strong>and</strong> 10 cm at r = 5 mm (Figure 4.19). Again,<br />

in every case β acts to oppose α along a nearly linear trend, with the response being<br />

strongest for σ d = 0.5. The sense <strong>of</strong> the effect at the two stress states is also opposite,<br />

with |β| varying directly with element length for σ d = 0.5, <strong>and</strong> indirectly for σ d = 0. The<br />

spread in the directional variability is about three times greater at σ d = 0.5 <strong>and</strong> is equal to<br />

about 85% <strong>of</strong> α. These results are entirely consistent with those reported in previous<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>propagation</strong> path stability for segmented opening-mode cracks using the<br />

kinked-tip approach (Broberg, 1987; Cotterell <strong>and</strong> Rice, 1980; Melin, 1983, 1987;<br />

Thomas <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 1993), which indicate that the misorientation <strong>of</strong> successive<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!