structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
made <strong>of</strong> the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire. A synopsis <strong>and</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> those<br />
observations <strong>and</strong> interpretations is presented below. Throughout the rest <strong>of</strong> this paper,<br />
only CBS in the Aztec are considered. All other younger <strong>structural</strong> fabrics—shear b<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
joints <strong>and</strong> joint-based faults—are ignored.<br />
3.1. Outcrop observations<br />
Compaction b<strong>and</strong>s in the otherwise weakly lithified Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone tend to weather<br />
out in positive relief as sharply delineated tabular fins, rendering them readily visible in<br />
outcrop (Figure 4.2). In areas <strong>of</strong> outcrop relief, individual CBs are seen to be grossly<br />
penny-shaped (i.e. very thin, oblate discs). Expansive exposures over more than 10 km 2<br />
in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire represent an approximately horizontal observation plane through the<br />
3-D CB array, revealing a detailed 2-D pattern. Viewed in total, the impression is one <strong>of</strong><br />
a very consistent, NNW-trending, sub-parallel (anastomosing) pattern <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s exhibiting<br />
meter to centimeter spacing <strong>and</strong> interspersed with areas up to tens <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> m 2 that<br />
are relatively devoid <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s. While the map-view observation plane does not actually<br />
cut exactly perpendicular to the dominant b<strong>and</strong> orientation, which currently dips eastward<br />
at 70-75°, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> basic pattern analysis, interpretation <strong>and</strong> the 2-D<br />
mechanical modeling to come, we make the simplifying assumptions that the current map<br />
view represents paleo horizontal at the time <strong>of</strong> CB formation <strong>and</strong> that the b<strong>and</strong>s<br />
themselves were vertical.<br />
In outcrop, b<strong>and</strong> patterns range from nearly straight <strong>and</strong> parallel, to strongly<br />
anastomosing, to essentially dendritic, to markedly uniform checkerboards comprised <strong>of</strong><br />
two distinct b<strong>and</strong> sets crosscutting each other at high angle (Figure 4.3). Truly parallel,<br />
evenly spaced b<strong>and</strong> patterns are not observed at any substantial scale, while the dendritic<br />
<strong>and</strong> checkerboard patterns occur as relatively rare, localized pockets within the dominant,<br />
sub-parallel pattern. In fact, the dominant, through-going b<strong>and</strong> trend—sometimes steeply<br />
W-dipping, but usually steeply E-dipping—is present in every b<strong>and</strong> pattern observed.<br />
The complex æolian sedimentary architecture <strong>of</strong> the Aztec also clearly influenced the<br />
extent <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> individual b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s, which are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
observed to warp, terminate <strong>and</strong>/or change configuration at or near cross-bed boundaries,<br />
particularly major interdune contacts (Figure 4.4).<br />
89