06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

made <strong>of</strong> the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire. A synopsis <strong>and</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> those<br />

observations <strong>and</strong> interpretations is presented below. Throughout the rest <strong>of</strong> this paper,<br />

only CBS in the Aztec are considered. All other younger <strong>structural</strong> fabrics—shear b<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

joints <strong>and</strong> joint-based faults—are ignored.<br />

3.1. Outcrop observations<br />

Compaction b<strong>and</strong>s in the otherwise weakly lithified Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone tend to weather<br />

out in positive relief as sharply delineated tabular fins, rendering them readily visible in<br />

outcrop (Figure 4.2). In areas <strong>of</strong> outcrop relief, individual CBs are seen to be grossly<br />

penny-shaped (i.e. very thin, oblate discs). Expansive exposures over more than 10 km 2<br />

in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire represent an approximately horizontal observation plane through the<br />

3-D CB array, revealing a detailed 2-D pattern. Viewed in total, the impression is one <strong>of</strong><br />

a very consistent, NNW-trending, sub-parallel (anastomosing) pattern <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s exhibiting<br />

meter to centimeter spacing <strong>and</strong> interspersed with areas up to tens <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> m 2 that<br />

are relatively devoid <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s. While the map-view observation plane does not actually<br />

cut exactly perpendicular to the dominant b<strong>and</strong> orientation, which currently dips eastward<br />

at 70-75°, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> basic pattern analysis, interpretation <strong>and</strong> the 2-D<br />

mechanical modeling to come, we make the simplifying assumptions that the current map<br />

view represents paleo horizontal at the time <strong>of</strong> CB formation <strong>and</strong> that the b<strong>and</strong>s<br />

themselves were vertical.<br />

In outcrop, b<strong>and</strong> patterns range from nearly straight <strong>and</strong> parallel, to strongly<br />

anastomosing, to essentially dendritic, to markedly uniform checkerboards comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

two distinct b<strong>and</strong> sets crosscutting each other at high angle (Figure 4.3). Truly parallel,<br />

evenly spaced b<strong>and</strong> patterns are not observed at any substantial scale, while the dendritic<br />

<strong>and</strong> checkerboard patterns occur as relatively rare, localized pockets within the dominant,<br />

sub-parallel pattern. In fact, the dominant, through-going b<strong>and</strong> trend—sometimes steeply<br />

W-dipping, but usually steeply E-dipping—is present in every b<strong>and</strong> pattern observed.<br />

The complex æolian sedimentary architecture <strong>of</strong> the Aztec also clearly influenced the<br />

extent <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> individual b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s, which are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

observed to warp, terminate <strong>and</strong>/or change configuration at or near cross-bed boundaries,<br />

particularly major interdune contacts (Figure 4.4).<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!