06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prior to 2013, the Act specifies that cellulosic biomass ethanol or waste derived<br />

ethanol will be considered equivalent to 2.5 gallons <strong>of</strong> renewable fuel when determining<br />

compliance with the renewable volume obligation. As discussed in Section III.D below,<br />

a batch’s RIN would indicate whether it was cellulosic or non-cellulosic ethanol.<br />

Beginning in 2013, the 2.5 to 1 ratio no longer applies for cellulosic biomass ethanol. In<br />

its place, the Act requires that the applicable volume <strong>of</strong> required renewable fuel specified<br />

in Table I.B-1 include a minimum <strong>of</strong> 250 million gallons that are derived from cellulosic<br />

biomass. As shown in Table III.A.2-1 above, we have estimated this value (250 million<br />

gallons) as a percent <strong>of</strong> an obligated party’s production for 2013. Thus, an obligated<br />

party would be subject to two st<strong>and</strong>ards in 2013 <strong>and</strong> beyond, a non-cellulosic st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

<strong>and</strong> a cellulosic st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

3. Compliance In 2007<br />

The Energy Act requires that EPA promulgate regulations to implement the RFS<br />

program, <strong>and</strong> if EPA did not issue such regulations then a default st<strong>and</strong>ard for renewable<br />

fuel use would apply in 2006. As described in Section I.C, we promulgated a direct final<br />

rule to interpret <strong>and</strong> implement the application <strong>of</strong> the statutory default st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> 2.78<br />

percent in calendar year 2006. However, the Act provides no default st<strong>and</strong>ard for any<br />

other year. Instead, the regulations we promulgate are required to address renewable fuel<br />

usage, including calendar year 2007. The program we are proposing today will therefore<br />

apply in 2007. While we plan to promulgate the final rule as soon after today's proposal<br />

as possible, it will likely not be effective by January 1, 2007. Therefore, our proposal<br />

must address how, <strong>and</strong> for what time periods, the applicable st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> other program<br />

requirements will apply to regulated parties for gasoline produced during 2007.<br />

We have identified several options for 2007 compliance. One option would be to<br />

extend the collective compliance approach used for 2006 to 2007. Although the Act<br />

contains no default st<strong>and</strong>ard applicable to 2007, under this approach we would apply the<br />

renewable fuel st<strong>and</strong>ard that we calculate for 2007 to obligated parties on a collective<br />

basis rather than on an individual basis. Under this approach, no individual facility or<br />

company would be liable for meeting the applicable st<strong>and</strong>ard. At the end <strong>of</strong> 2007 we<br />

would determine if the industry as a whole had met the st<strong>and</strong>ard on average, <strong>and</strong> any<br />

deficit would be carried over into 2008. This approach would be essentially equivalent to<br />

deferring the start <strong>of</strong> the program to 2008, but with the addition <strong>of</strong> an industry-wide<br />

deficit carryover provision. Current projections from the Energy Information<br />

Administration (EIA) on the volume <strong>of</strong> renewable fuel expected to be produced in 2007<br />

indicate that an industry-wide deficit carryover would most likely be unnecessary under<br />

this collective compliance approach.<br />

However, given the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Act, we do not believe that a collective<br />

compliance approach is appropriate for 2007. The Energy Act requires us to promulgate<br />

regulations that provide for the generation <strong>of</strong> credits by any person who overcomplies<br />

with their obligation. It also stipulates that a person who generates credits must be<br />

permitted to use them for compliance purposes, or to transfer them to another party.<br />

- 36 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!