06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> their more approximate nature. Their geographical concentration also makes it more<br />

difficult to simulate with the Ozone RSM.<br />

The Ozone RSM was created using multiple runs <strong>of</strong> the Comprehensive Air<br />

Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx). Base <strong>and</strong> proposed control CAMx<br />

metamodeling was completed for the year 2015 over a modeling domain that includes all<br />

or part <strong>of</strong> 37 Eastern U.S. states, plus the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia. For more information on<br />

the Ozone RSM, please see the Chapter 5 <strong>of</strong> the DRIA for this proposal.<br />

The Ozone RSM limits the number <strong>of</strong> geographically distinct changes in VOC<br />

<strong>and</strong> NOx emissions which can be simulated. As a result, we could not apply distinct<br />

changes in emissions for each county. Therefore, two separate runs were made with<br />

different VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions reductions. We then selected the ozone impacts from<br />

the various runs which best matched the VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emission reductions for that<br />

county. This models the impact <strong>of</strong> local emissions reasonably well, but loses some<br />

accuracy with respect to ozone transport. No ozone impact was assumed for areas which<br />

did not experience a significant change in ethanol use. The predicted ozone impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

increased ethanol use for those areas where ethanol use is projected to change by more<br />

than a 50% market share are summarized in Table VIII.C.1-1. As shown in the Table<br />

5.1-2 <strong>of</strong> the DRIA, national average impacts (based on the 37-state area modeled) which<br />

include those areas where no change in ethanol use is occurring are considerably smaller.<br />

Table VIII.C.1-1<br />

Impact on 8-hour Design Value Equivalent Ozone Levels (ppb) a<br />

Primary Analysis Sensitivity Analysis<br />

Min RFG Use Max RFG Use Min RFG Use Max RFG Use<br />

Minimum Change -0.030 -0.025 -0.180 0.000<br />

Maximum Change 0.395 0.526 0.637 0.625<br />

Average Change b<br />

0.137 0.171 0.294 0.318<br />

Population-<br />

0.134 0.129 0.268 0.250<br />

Weighted Change b<br />

a In comparison to the 80 ppb 8-hour ozone st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

b Only for those areas experiencing a change in ethanol blend market share <strong>of</strong> at least 50 percent.<br />

As can be seen, ozone levels generally increase to a small degree with increased<br />

ethanol use. This is likely due to the projected increases in both VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx<br />

emissions. Some areas do see a small decrease in ozone levels. In our primary analysis,<br />

where exhaust emissions from Tier 1 <strong>and</strong> later onroad vehicles are assumed to be<br />

unaffected by ethanol use, the population-weighted increase in ambient ozone levels in<br />

those areas where ethanol use changed significantly is 0.129-0.134 ppb. Since the 8-hour<br />

ambient ozone st<strong>and</strong>ard is 80 ppb, this increase represents about 0.16 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard, a very small percentage.<br />

In our sensitivity analysis, where exhaust emissions from Tier 1 <strong>and</strong> later onroad<br />

vehicles are assumed to respond to ethanol like Tier 0 vehicles, the population-weighted<br />

- 168 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!