06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

strategy. Accordingly, a reduced amount <strong>of</strong> ethanol was allocated to oxy-fuel areas in<br />

2012. The remaining ethanol was distributed to conventional gasoline (CG) in different<br />

states based on a computed ethanol margin (rack gasoline price minus ethanol delivered<br />

price adjusted by miscellaneous subsidies/penalties). The methodology is described in<br />

DRIA Section 2.1.4.3.<br />

The main difference in the four resulting ethanol consumption scenarios was how<br />

far the ethanol penetrated the conventional gasoline pool. A summary <strong>of</strong> the forecasted<br />

2012 ethanol consumption (by control case, fuel type <strong>and</strong> season) is found in Table<br />

VI.A.4-2.<br />

Table VI.A.4-2<br />

2012 Forecasted U.S. Ethanol Consumption by Season<br />

OXY a<br />

CG RFG<br />

2012 Control Case Summer Winter Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter<br />

7.2 Bgal / Max-RFG 1,269 1,537 72 1,932 2,389 3,201 3,999<br />

7.2 Bgal / Min-RFG 2,144 2,571 72 244 2,168 2,388 4,812<br />

9.6 Bgal / Max-RFG 2,356 2,830 73 1,941 2,400 4,297 5,303<br />

9.6 Bgal / Min-RFG 3,223 3,881 73 246 2,178 3,468 6,132<br />

b<br />

Ethanol Consumption (MMgal)<br />

Total<br />

a<br />

Winter oxy-fuel programs<br />

b<br />

Federal RFG plus CA Phase 3 RFG <strong>and</strong> Arizona CBG<br />

As expected, the least amount <strong>of</strong> ethanol was consumed in conventional gasoline<br />

in the 7.2 billion gallon control case when a maximum amount was allocated to RFG.<br />

Similarly, the most ethanol was consumed in CG in the 9.6 billion gallon control case<br />

when a minimum amount was allocated to RFG. For more information on the four<br />

resulting 2012 control cases, refer to DRIA Section 2.1.4.6.<br />

B. Overview <strong>of</strong> Biodiesel Industry <strong>and</strong> Future Production/Consumption<br />

1. Characterization <strong>of</strong> U.S. Biodiesel Production/Consumption<br />

Historically, the cost to make biodiesel was an inhibiting factor to production in<br />

the U.S. The cost to produce biodiesel was high compared to the price <strong>of</strong> petroleum<br />

derived diesel fuel, even with consideration <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> subsidies <strong>and</strong> credits<br />

provided by federal <strong>and</strong> state programs. Much <strong>of</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> occurred as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

m<strong>and</strong>ates from states <strong>and</strong> local municipalities, which required the use <strong>of</strong> biodiesel.<br />

However, over the past couple years biodiesel production has been increasing rapidly.<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> higher crude oil prices <strong>and</strong> greater federal tax subsidies has created a<br />

favorable economic situation. The Biodiesel Blenders Tax Credit programs <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Commodity Credit Commission Bio-energy Program, both subsidize producers <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

production costs. The Energy Policy Act extended the Biodiesel Blenders Tax Credit<br />

program to 2008. This credit provides about one dollar per gallon in the form <strong>of</strong> a federal<br />

excise tax credit to biodiesel blenders from virgin vegetable oil feedstocks <strong>and</strong> 50 cents<br />

- 128 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!