06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As discussed in Section III.D, it is not necessary to track renewable fuels all the<br />

way to the point <strong>of</strong> blending because we can confidently treat production volumes as an<br />

accurate surrogate for consumption. This fact provides the basis for our proposed<br />

program, <strong>and</strong> could also be used in support <strong>of</strong> the alternatives described previously. If<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> blending were required before a RIN could be separated from a batch, both<br />

obligated parties <strong>and</strong> blenders would be subject to additional recordkeeping <strong>and</strong><br />

paperwork burdens. The Agency would be compelled to enforce activities at the blender<br />

level, adding about 1200 parties to the list <strong>of</strong> those subject to enforcement under our<br />

proposed program.<br />

By requiring refiners to wait until renewable fuel is blended before they can<br />

separate the RIN, this alternative approach could limit the potential for one refiner to<br />

purchase large volumes <strong>of</strong> renewable fuel with the intent <strong>of</strong> separating the RINs <strong>and</strong><br />

exercising market power in the RIN market. However, we do not believe that this<br />

represents an advantage to this alternative since it could not occur under our proposed<br />

program either. There are no geographic limitations to RIN transfers within the 48<br />

contiguous states, so obligated parties that need RINs can purchase them from any refiner<br />

who has an excess. In addition, RINs that have been separated from their assigned<br />

batches by oxygenate blenders represent an additional safety valve in the RIN market,<br />

providing additional assurances that no one refiner could exercise market power in the<br />

RIN market, thereby dem<strong>and</strong>ing an unreasonably high price for them.<br />

For these reasons, we do not believe that requiring renewable fuel to be blended<br />

into gasoline or diesel before a RIN could be separated from the batch would provide any<br />

significant advantages over our proposed program. However, we request comment on<br />

this alternative approach.<br />

e. Blender At Time Of Blending<br />

Although we have concluded that production volumes are an accurate surrogate<br />

for consumption, thus eliminating the need to measure renewable fuel volumes at the<br />

point <strong>of</strong> blending into gasoline or diesel, an alternative approach would do just that.<br />

In this alternative program approach, RINs would not be generated by the<br />

producer <strong>of</strong> the renewable fuel <strong>and</strong> assigned to batches. Instead, blenders would keep<br />

detailed records <strong>of</strong> the volumes <strong>of</strong> renewable fuel that they blended into gasoline or<br />

diesel, <strong>and</strong> would generate credits for those volumes. Blenders would be considered<br />

obligated parties, but their obligation would be considered as zero percent to avoid<br />

redundant obligations (i.e. to avoid the blender being responsible for blending renewable<br />

fuel into gasoline for which a refiner or importer also has an RFS program<br />

responsibility). Thus they would generate credits which could then be sold to a refiner or<br />

importer who needs it for compliance purposes.<br />

- 101 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!