05.08.2013 Views

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 EQUATIONAL LOGIC<br />

conversely, every finite distributive lattice with unique atom can be represented in this<br />

way (H. P. Gumm, unpublished). T. Evans informed the author that there exists a<br />

finite commutative semigroup with A(Z) infinite.<br />

13.3. For F = group theory, A(F) is modular, but very complicated, and<br />

moreover can be given structure beyond the lattice-theoretic (see [330] and 17.9<br />

below). At and near the top A(F) contains<br />

ß<br />

ß<br />

x=y<br />

(x rn= I, xy=yx)<br />

xy = yx<br />

with m > 1, ordered by divisibility - the Abelian part. It turned out to be difficult to<br />

prove that IA(F)I = 2 0. This was established by Vaughan-Lee [434] who found 0<br />

irredundant equations (as in õ11), and independently, by Ol'shanski¾ [337] who<br />

found 0 "independent" subdirectly irreducible groups. (Cf. 9.18 above.) The variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3-nilpotent groups has been completely described - see J6nsson [220] or<br />

Remeslennikov [ 376].<br />

13.4. For Z = semigroup theory, many results are known; consult the survey by<br />

Evans [124] for more detailed information. Biryukov (1965) and later Evans [120]<br />

first proved that [A(;)I = 2 0 (also see [198] for a nice infinite irredundant set <strong>of</strong><br />

semigroup laws). Dean and Evans [106] proved that x(yz)= (xy)z is finitely<br />

meet-irreducible in A, i.e., that A(Z) has a f'mitely meet-irreducible least element.<br />

Burris and Nelson [79] (and later Jeek [211 ] ) proved that A(Z) contains a copy <strong>of</strong><br />

Iloo, the lattice <strong>of</strong> partitions on an infinite set, and hence obeys no special lattice laws.<br />

The fact that A(Z) is non-modular can be seen from this sublattice - due to Jezek -<br />

isomorphic to the smallest non-modular lattice, NS:<br />

xy = zw<br />

xy = xz ß I<br />

xyz = xzy<br />

xy = yx<br />

/ xyz = xzy = zxy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!