05.08.2013 Views

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

Survey 1979: Equational Logic - Department of Mathematics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WALTER TAYLOR 29<br />

12.12. Mod ; is residually small (cf. 14.8 below) (McNulty [306] ).<br />

PROBLEM 4. (Mycielski - see [197]). Is it decidable whether a finite set <strong>of</strong><br />

terms is jointly c-universal 0c a fixed cardinal)?<br />

(Terms ri(x 1 ,...,Xni) (1 i n) in operations F 1 ,...,F s are jointly c-universal iff<br />

for any operations Gi: c ni - c, the operations F 1 ,...,F s can be defined on c so that the<br />

term r i defines G i (1 i n). This notion <strong>of</strong> universality has been very useful in the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> undecidability <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> equations - see McNulty [305] .)<br />

Finally, we mention that Burris and Sankappanavar [80] have investigated<br />

undecidability properties <strong>of</strong> congruence lattices and lattices <strong>of</strong> subvarieties (õ 13 just<br />

below). A sample result: in a similarity type with at least one operation <strong>of</strong> rank 2,<br />

the lattice A <strong>of</strong> all equational theories has a hereditarily undecidable first order<br />

theory.<br />

13. The lattice <strong>of</strong> equational theories. For a fixed type (nt)tCT, order the<br />

family A <strong>of</strong> all equational theories by inclusion. One easily sees (from Birkh<strong>of</strong>f's<br />

Theorem <strong>of</strong> õ5 or directly from the definition at the beginning <strong>of</strong> õ5), that A is<br />

closed under arbitrary intersections - and so from purely lattice theoretic<br />

considerations, A has arbitrary joins as well, and so is a complete lattice. More<br />

specifically,<br />

iGVlEi = {e' iGoi;i [- e} = Eq(iiMod Ei).<br />

From the pro<strong>of</strong>-theoretic characterization <strong>of</strong> v it follows that A is an algebraic closure<br />

system and hence an algebraic lattice (see [91] [163] or [165]). Specifically, the<br />

compact elements <strong>of</strong> A are the finitely based theories <strong>of</strong> õ9 above, and every element<br />

is the join (actually the union) <strong>of</strong> all its finitely based subtheories. Obviously the join<br />

<strong>of</strong> two finitely based theories is finitely based (this holds for compact elements in any<br />

lattice); but the meet (i.e., intersection) <strong>of</strong> two finitely based theories can fail to be<br />

finitely based. We present an example <strong>of</strong> Karn<strong>of</strong>sky (unpublished - see [354]) (here<br />

and below we will sometimes express a theory by one <strong>of</strong> its finite bases without<br />

further mention)' Z 1 ß x(yz) = (xy)z ;2' x(yz) = (xy)z<br />

(xyz) 2 = x2y2z2 x3y 3 = y3x3<br />

x3y3z2w 3 = y3x3z2w 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!