A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project
A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project
A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Spill</strong> Return Periods for Medium and Large <strong>Spill</strong>s<br />
Volume 7B <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enbridge</strong> application identifies return periods for a hydrocarbon 37<br />
release that occurs along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route. <strong>Enbridge</strong> calculates spill return periods<br />
with liquid pipeline failure frequency data from 1991 to 2009 from <strong>the</strong> National Energy<br />
Board (NEB). According to <strong>Enbridge</strong>, NEB data best represent <strong>the</strong> ENGP because data<br />
are based on hydrocarbon transmission lines under <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NEB<br />
(<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B, p. 3-‐1). <strong>Enbridge</strong> notes that NEB data include pipelines up to<br />
50 years old that use older technology and building material standards associated with<br />
an increased frequency <strong>of</strong> failures compared to modern pipelines (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol.<br />
7B, p. 3-‐1). Accordingly, <strong>Enbridge</strong> factored improved design features and mitigation<br />
planning characteristic <strong>of</strong> modern pipelines into its failure frequency calculations.<br />
Improvement factors are expected to decrease <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> pipeline failure<br />
relative to NEB failure frequency data (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B, p. 3-‐1). The ENGP<br />
pipeline spill analysis does not provide <strong>the</strong> original or adjusted NEB spill data that was<br />
used in <strong>the</strong> analysis, does not document <strong>the</strong> adjustments made to <strong>the</strong> NEB data and<br />
provides no evidence to support <strong>the</strong> downward adjustment <strong>of</strong> NEB spill rates for <strong>the</strong><br />
ENGP.<br />
<strong>Enbridge</strong> estimates return periods for various spill size categories <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbon<br />
releases for six regions along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route. <strong>Enbridge</strong> bases spill size categories on<br />
NEB classifications whereby a small spill is less than 30 m 3 , a medium spill ranges<br />
between 30 and 1,000 m 3 , and a large spill exceeds 1,000 m 3 (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B).<br />
<strong>Enbridge</strong> identifies <strong>the</strong> six physiographic regions along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route as <strong>the</strong> Eastern<br />
Alberta Plains, <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Alberta Uplands, Alberta Plateau, Rocky Mountains,<br />
Interior Plateau, and <strong>the</strong> Coast Mountains.<br />
Table A-‐23 presents spill return periods calculated by <strong>Enbridge</strong> for medium and large<br />
spills in <strong>the</strong> six regions. Based on <strong>the</strong> adjusted NEB frequency data, spill return periods<br />
for medium spills range between 118 and 1,082 years for each physiographic region,<br />
while spill return periods for large spills range between 275 and 2,525 years per region.<br />
<strong>Enbridge</strong> does not combine spill return periods for <strong>the</strong> six regions nor does it combine<br />
return periods for medium and large spills. Combined, <strong>the</strong> six regions result in spill<br />
return periods for medium and large spills <strong>of</strong> 41 and 95 years, respectively, for <strong>the</strong><br />
entire pipeline route. Similarly, combining overall return periods for medium and large<br />
spills for <strong>the</strong> entire length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pipeline results in a return period <strong>of</strong> 28 years.<br />
<strong>Enbridge</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r estimates nor presents spill return periods for small spills, yet simply<br />
states “Smaller releases (less than 30 m 3 ) occur more frequently” (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol.<br />
7B, p. 3-‐2).<br />
37 <strong>Enbridge</strong> (2010b Vol. 7B p. 3-‐1) refers to pipeline spills as hydrocarbon spills. We interpret hydrocarbon<br />
spills to include both oil and condensate and thus assume spill return periods represent oil or condensate<br />
spills.<br />
102