05.08.2013 Views

A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project

A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project

A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Spill</strong> Return Periods for Medium and Large <strong>Spill</strong>s<br />

Volume 7B <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enbridge</strong> application identifies return periods for a hydrocarbon 37<br />

release that occurs along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route. <strong>Enbridge</strong> calculates spill return periods<br />

with liquid pipeline failure frequency data from 1991 to 2009 from <strong>the</strong> National Energy<br />

Board (NEB). According to <strong>Enbridge</strong>, NEB data best represent <strong>the</strong> ENGP because data<br />

are based on hydrocarbon transmission lines under <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NEB<br />

(<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B, p. 3-­‐1). <strong>Enbridge</strong> notes that NEB data include pipelines up to<br />

50 years old that use older technology and building material standards associated with<br />

an increased frequency <strong>of</strong> failures compared to modern pipelines (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol.<br />

7B, p. 3-­‐1). Accordingly, <strong>Enbridge</strong> factored improved design features and mitigation<br />

planning characteristic <strong>of</strong> modern pipelines into its failure frequency calculations.<br />

Improvement factors are expected to decrease <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> pipeline failure<br />

relative to NEB failure frequency data (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B, p. 3-­‐1). The ENGP<br />

pipeline spill analysis does not provide <strong>the</strong> original or adjusted NEB spill data that was<br />

used in <strong>the</strong> analysis, does not document <strong>the</strong> adjustments made to <strong>the</strong> NEB data and<br />

provides no evidence to support <strong>the</strong> downward adjustment <strong>of</strong> NEB spill rates for <strong>the</strong><br />

ENGP.<br />

<strong>Enbridge</strong> estimates return periods for various spill size categories <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbon<br />

releases for six regions along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route. <strong>Enbridge</strong> bases spill size categories on<br />

NEB classifications whereby a small spill is less than 30 m 3 , a medium spill ranges<br />

between 30 and 1,000 m 3 , and a large spill exceeds 1,000 m 3 (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol. 7B).<br />

<strong>Enbridge</strong> identifies <strong>the</strong> six physiographic regions along <strong>the</strong> pipeline route as <strong>the</strong> Eastern<br />

Alberta Plains, <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Alberta Uplands, Alberta Plateau, Rocky Mountains,<br />

Interior Plateau, and <strong>the</strong> Coast Mountains.<br />

Table A-­‐23 presents spill return periods calculated by <strong>Enbridge</strong> for medium and large<br />

spills in <strong>the</strong> six regions. Based on <strong>the</strong> adjusted NEB frequency data, spill return periods<br />

for medium spills range between 118 and 1,082 years for each physiographic region,<br />

while spill return periods for large spills range between 275 and 2,525 years per region.<br />

<strong>Enbridge</strong> does not combine spill return periods for <strong>the</strong> six regions nor does it combine<br />

return periods for medium and large spills. Combined, <strong>the</strong> six regions result in spill<br />

return periods for medium and large spills <strong>of</strong> 41 and 95 years, respectively, for <strong>the</strong><br />

entire pipeline route. Similarly, combining overall return periods for medium and large<br />

spills for <strong>the</strong> entire length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pipeline results in a return period <strong>of</strong> 28 years.<br />

<strong>Enbridge</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r estimates nor presents spill return periods for small spills, yet simply<br />

states “Smaller releases (less than 30 m 3 ) occur more frequently” (<strong>Enbridge</strong> 2010b Vol.<br />

7B, p. 3-­‐2).<br />

37 <strong>Enbridge</strong> (2010b Vol. 7B p. 3-­‐1) refers to pipeline spills as hydrocarbon spills. We interpret hydrocarbon<br />

spills to include both oil and condensate and thus assume spill return periods represent oil or condensate<br />

spills.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!