05.08.2013 Views

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

extension of deterritorialization through the combination of state and capitalist forces in a<br />

violence-perpetuating system. It is also through deterritorialization that empires are able<br />

to shift from their autochthonous territory to acquire new territory. Likewise,<br />

compensatory actions of reterritorialization are present in resistance to colonialism.<br />

Unsurprising given the authors’ connection to empire, economics, the state,<br />

society and territory, history also forms a considerable element of their thought. Though<br />

Deleuze espouses the possibility that human nature could not be understood by history<br />

and both authors rail against the “sedentary” vision of history, overall they appreciate<br />

history and only suggest new approaches to historiography to correct difficulties. 38 This<br />

is evident in the vital role the authors give to “difference and repetition” and a universal<br />

history where forces of desire and power shape society. 39 By working toward a<br />

“coexistence” of events instead of a “succession,” the historian can render “the history of<br />

contingencies and encounters.” 40 Concurrently, Deleuze and Guattari call upon historians<br />

to investigate the social stratum and look to the deep structures that lie beneath. 41<br />

Some of Deleuze and Guattari’s visions of history appear excessively relativist or<br />

to negate history. Yet their work is heavily informed by historiography and can even be<br />

considered a historical investigation. Deleuze in particular argues the importance of<br />

empirical knowledge to historical awareness. 42 Their history is a highly unpredictable<br />

and contingent history, but it is only degrees more contingent than the history written by<br />

most academic historians. The authors clearly intend their ideas to be applied to<br />

historical formations for they always seek to determine significant themes in human<br />

interaction in the past, present and the future. In this context, their theory emerges as<br />

another new species of the “intellectual history” that Elizabeth A. Clark sees as beneficial<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!