A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
extension of deterritorialization through the combination of state and capitalist forces in a<br />
violence-perpetuating system. It is also through deterritorialization that empires are able<br />
to shift from their autochthonous territory to acquire new territory. Likewise,<br />
compensatory actions of reterritorialization are present in resistance to colonialism.<br />
Unsurprising given the authors’ connection to empire, economics, the state,<br />
society and territory, history also forms a considerable element of their thought. Though<br />
Deleuze espouses the possibility that human nature could not be understood by history<br />
and both authors rail against the “sedentary” vision of history, overall they appreciate<br />
history and only suggest new approaches to historiography to correct difficulties. 38 This<br />
is evident in the vital role the authors give to “difference and repetition” and a universal<br />
history where forces of desire and power shape society. 39 By working toward a<br />
“coexistence” of events instead of a “succession,” the historian can render “the history of<br />
contingencies and encounters.” 40 Concurrently, Deleuze and Guattari call upon historians<br />
to investigate the social stratum and look to the deep structures that lie beneath. 41<br />
Some of Deleuze and Guattari’s visions of history appear excessively relativist or<br />
to negate history. Yet their work is heavily informed by historiography and can even be<br />
considered a historical investigation. Deleuze in particular argues the importance of<br />
empirical knowledge to historical awareness. 42 Their history is a highly unpredictable<br />
and contingent history, but it is only degrees more contingent than the history written by<br />
most academic historians. The authors clearly intend their ideas to be applied to<br />
historical formations for they always seek to determine significant themes in human<br />
interaction in the past, present and the future. In this context, their theory emerges as<br />
another new species of the “intellectual history” that Elizabeth A. Clark sees as beneficial<br />
29