A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
implies a deterritorialization of previous territories and peoples. 25 Such territorial entities<br />
as land, property and nation inherently possess a force of deterritorialization. Similarly,<br />
people’s relations with territory are demonstrably highly fluid and deterritorialized.<br />
Territory also forms a crucial area of investigation for this study, both in the notion of<br />
spatial power that Michel Foucault identifies and in the fact that the desire for territory<br />
was vital to the colonial expansion. 26<br />
Correspondingly important to their theory is the vision of deterritorialization’s<br />
exemplification of the human social system. Social groups transform from relatively<br />
isolated entities into socially-conditioned and amorphous multiplicities through<br />
deterritorialization. Deleuze and Guattari maintain that no historical social system has<br />
ever existed in exclusion that did not permeate its neighbours. 27 This leads the authors to<br />
argue that there is no history except the history of the aggregate majority, for no<br />
minorities can escape deterritorialization or assimilation. However, this is not to suggest<br />
that difference does not dominate the populace, for the sole way minorities can escape<br />
history and the majority is through deterritorialization. 28 Therefore, syncretic social<br />
relations and resistance to hegemonic social codes demonstrate deterritorialization within<br />
colonial expansion. This is critical to history since Deleuze and Guattari contend that<br />
deterritorialization and attendant reterritorialization animate social relations. 29<br />
The two authors have a quite negative conception of the state, chiefly because of<br />
its despotic need to dominate other forms of social relations. 30 Deleuze and Guattari<br />
believe that the state exists as an entity separated from the territory that it controls, an<br />
ideological and transcendental entity above the immanent application of power that<br />
organizes the whole. 31 By disrupting and combining forms of territorial organization that<br />
27