A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

45 Patton quotes Deleuze from his Negotiations work in: Paul Patton, “Conceptual
Politics and the War-Machine in Mille Plateaux,” SubStance 44/45 (1984): 61, 63.
Lambert.
46 Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Marxism and the
Interpretation of Culture, eds. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (Basingstoke: Macmillan
Education, 1988), 273, 279, 286, 290.
47 Paul A. Passavant and Jodi Dean, Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri
(New York: Routledge, 2004), 262. Slavoj _i_ek, Organs Without Bodies: Deleuze and
Consequences (New York: Routledge, 2004), 48. Patton, “Marxism and Beyond,” 129.
Alistair Welchman, “Machinic Thinking,” in: Deleuze and Philosophy: The Difference
Engineer ed. Keith Ansell Pearson, (London: Routledge, 1997), 211-226. Jameson,
“Marxism and Dualism in Deleuze,” 20-21, 26-29, 31, 34. Fredric Jameson, “Marxism
and Historicism,” New Literary History 11, no. 1 (Autumn 1979): 41.
48 Jay Cantor, Review of Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia by Gilles Deleuze
and Felix Guattari in New Republic 177, no. 26/27, (December 24 and 31, 1977): 37.
Manfred Frank, “The World as Representation: Deleuze and Guattari’s Critique of
Capitalism as Schizoanalysis and Schizo-Discourse,” Telos no. 57 (Fall 1983): 167, 173.
49 Noyes, Colonial Space. Said, 278, 331. Alfred J. López, Posts and Pasts: A Theory of
Postcolonialism (Albany, NY: State University of New York, 2001), 6.
50 In this manner, their deterritorialization mirrors Marx’s idea of the colonizing
government as a “conqueror, who, with each new land, only conquers a new border.”
Karl Marx, Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (23) I, 147. is cited in: Noyes,
Colonial Space, 59.
51 This study understands such scholars to be Rudolf Hilferding, John A. Hobson, Karl
Kautsky, Rosa Luxemburg, Nikolai Bukharin, Mao Tse-Tung, Eugen Varga, Joseph
Schumpeter, Max Weber, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Hannah Arendt, David K.
Fieldhouse, and Herbert Lüthy.
52 Deleuze and Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, xx.
53 Thomas, 19. More specifically, the authors contend that their schizoanalytic
perspective should be utilized in the study of colonialism, for Freudian psychoanalytic
discourse grounded colonial power relations and therefore schizoanalysis must correct its
misrepresentations. Deleuze and Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, 170.
54 Phillip Pomper, “World History and its Critics,” History and Theory 34, no. 2 (May
1995): 5, 7.
55 Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 53.
124