A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lastly, Deleuze and Guattari’s paratactic questioning of absolute and linear causal<br />
relationships could perhaps threaten the place of meaning in history. But the search for<br />
the diverse motivations for <strong>German</strong> colonialism and African responses to expansionism<br />
illustrates how an open approach to cause-effect interactions reveals both the contiguities<br />
between specific historical moments and the broader picture of social, cultural, economic<br />
and political relations. Deterritorialization’s mixture of telling detail and over-arching<br />
structure depicts colonialism in a manner that bestows significant historical meaning.<br />
107<br />
Deterritorialization reveals how the traditional approach to colonial history<br />
exemplified within some historiography advances simplistic and over-stated arguments.<br />
Similarly, the Marxist interpretations cannot capture colonial economics since they do not<br />
seriously investigate how capitalism affected Africa. Similarly, the narrow works that try<br />
to make colonial expansion explicable through isolated causalities cannot render a history<br />
of colonial expansion on both the micro- and macro-level. It has been argued here that<br />
the social cannot be separated from the cultural, commercial and political elements that<br />
influenced the expansion. A more comprehensive interpretation needs to move away<br />
from the metropolitan facets of <strong>German</strong> colonialism towards research into local events,<br />
which can render a more holistic vision of colonialism. Examples of a more holistic<br />
method are found in the work of Heyden and Zeller, Bechhaus-Gerst and Klein-Arendt,<br />
Zimmerer, Kundrus, and Friedrichsmeyer, Lennox and Zantop. These interpretations<br />
attempt to weave together the diverse strands of <strong>German</strong> colonial history into a<br />
comprehensive vision. But even these fail in not excavating the broader trends beneath<br />
colonial encounters. By not looking to the motivations for colonialism as the older<br />
historiography has, they assume the presence of a definitive explanation for <strong>German</strong>