05.08.2013 Views

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

A Deterritorialized History: Investigating German Colonialism ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lastly, Deleuze and Guattari’s paratactic questioning of absolute and linear causal<br />

relationships could perhaps threaten the place of meaning in history. But the search for<br />

the diverse motivations for <strong>German</strong> colonialism and African responses to expansionism<br />

illustrates how an open approach to cause-effect interactions reveals both the contiguities<br />

between specific historical moments and the broader picture of social, cultural, economic<br />

and political relations. Deterritorialization’s mixture of telling detail and over-arching<br />

structure depicts colonialism in a manner that bestows significant historical meaning.<br />

107<br />

Deterritorialization reveals how the traditional approach to colonial history<br />

exemplified within some historiography advances simplistic and over-stated arguments.<br />

Similarly, the Marxist interpretations cannot capture colonial economics since they do not<br />

seriously investigate how capitalism affected Africa. Similarly, the narrow works that try<br />

to make colonial expansion explicable through isolated causalities cannot render a history<br />

of colonial expansion on both the micro- and macro-level. It has been argued here that<br />

the social cannot be separated from the cultural, commercial and political elements that<br />

influenced the expansion. A more comprehensive interpretation needs to move away<br />

from the metropolitan facets of <strong>German</strong> colonialism towards research into local events,<br />

which can render a more holistic vision of colonialism. Examples of a more holistic<br />

method are found in the work of Heyden and Zeller, Bechhaus-Gerst and Klein-Arendt,<br />

Zimmerer, Kundrus, and Friedrichsmeyer, Lennox and Zantop. These interpretations<br />

attempt to weave together the diverse strands of <strong>German</strong> colonial history into a<br />

comprehensive vision. But even these fail in not excavating the broader trends beneath<br />

colonial encounters. By not looking to the motivations for colonialism as the older<br />

historiography has, they assume the presence of a definitive explanation for <strong>German</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!