05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 15 44 (3 42 I1 9<br />

51<br />

LLETHARGY<br />

8 7<br />

5<br />

.I--<br />

ORN!.-DWG 67-14793<br />

4 1 0<br />

' I<br />

i<br />

ENERGY Lev)<br />

Fiy. 4.1. Calculated Epi<strong>the</strong>rmal Neutron Spectra in <strong>the</strong> 233U-Fweled MSRE and in <strong>the</strong> MSBR.<br />

fertile salt volume fractions of 16.48 and 5.85%<br />

respectively. The fuel salt contained approximately<br />

2.84 mole % UF4 (-64% of total IJ is 23iU<br />

and -5.9% is 235Uj, and <strong>the</strong> fertile salt contained<br />

27 mole % ThF,. By comparison, <strong>the</strong> model of <strong>the</strong><br />

Msm core used for this analysis was a cylinder<br />

with effective dimensions of 58 in. in diameter by<br />

78 in. in height. The fuel salt volume fraction is<br />

2236, and <strong>the</strong>re is no fertile salt. The uranium<br />

content of <strong>the</strong> fuel salt was approximately 0.125<br />

mole "/o UF4 (.~,91.4% 2331J), based on calculations<br />

summarized in <strong>the</strong> following section.<br />

As described in ref. 1, <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>rmal and <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

neutron spectra calculations were made with <strong>the</strong><br />

GAM and TIIEl?MOS programs respectively. In <strong>the</strong><br />

choice of an effective "<strong>the</strong>rmal cutoff" energy<br />

separating <strong>the</strong>se spectra, <strong>the</strong>re is a considerable<br />

degree of latitude, with <strong>the</strong> single restriction that<br />

<strong>the</strong> cutoff energy be high enough that important<br />

calculated neutronic properties at operating temperature<br />

are not strongly influenced by neglect of<br />

upscattering corrections above <strong>the</strong> cutoff energy.<br />

In previous studies of <strong>the</strong> MSRE, lS3 we used<br />

0.876 ev (for which <strong>the</strong> present energy group<br />

structures for <strong>the</strong> GAM and THEICiiOS programs<br />

coincide). This value was found to be sufficiently<br />

high to satisfy <strong>the</strong> preceding criterion. However,<br />

because current design calculations for <strong>the</strong> MSBR<br />

are based on <strong>the</strong> higher value of 1.86 ev, to make a<br />

valid comparison we calculated <strong>the</strong> MSKE <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

spectra for this higher cutoff energy.<br />

The results of GAM-I1 calculations of <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

neutron spectra in <strong>the</strong> two reactors are<br />

shown in Fig. 4.1. As in ref. 1, use is made of <strong>the</strong><br />

lethargy variable, proportional to <strong>the</strong> logarithm of<br />

<strong>the</strong> neutron energy, in plotting <strong>the</strong> results. This<br />

relation is<br />

lethargy : - In (energy/lO MeV) .<br />

For a unit fission source <strong>the</strong> calculated fluxes per<br />

unit 1et.hargy for each GAM-I1 neutron group are<br />

3P. N. Haubenrelrh et a1 , MSRE, Deslgn and Opera<br />

tions Report Part III Nrzcfear Analysis, <strong>ORNL</strong> TM<br />

730, pp. 38-40.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!