05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

etween runs contain enough uncertainty that an<br />

error of this magnitude could be lost. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />

shift in rod position cannot he assigned to ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> beginning or end of run 12. Even with this<br />

uncertainty in residual reactivity, <strong>the</strong> zero-power<br />

results fall within a very narrow band, whicii<br />

derrionstrates <strong>the</strong> continuing good performance of<br />

both <strong>the</strong> reactor system and <strong>the</strong> reactivity-balance<br />

calcitlation.<br />

MAL EFFECTS OF OPERATION<br />

C. H. Gabbard<br />

Radiation Heating<br />

Reactor Vessel. - The temperature differences<br />

between certain <strong>the</strong>rmocouples on <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

vessel and <strong>the</strong> reactor inlet temperature are monitored<br />

by <strong>the</strong> computer io determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is any evidence of a sedimentation buildup in <strong>the</strong><br />

lower head or on <strong>the</strong> core support flange. In <strong>the</strong><br />

previous semiannual report,' it was stated that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se temperature differences had increased. Fullpower<br />

data were reviewed from runs 6 through 12,<br />

and it now appears that <strong>the</strong> increase reported is<br />

within <strong>the</strong> data scatter. The average temperature<br />

differences for run 6 were 2.11 and 1.51°F/Mw<br />

for <strong>the</strong> core support flange and <strong>the</strong> lower head,<br />

respectively, and were 2.205 and P.5S°F/Mw for<br />

run 12.<br />

Fuel Pump Tank. - An unexplained downward<br />

shift in <strong>the</strong> temperature of <strong>the</strong> upper pump-tank<br />

surface was inentioned in <strong>the</strong> previous semiannual<br />

report. Past data for <strong>the</strong> pump-tank temperature<br />

and for <strong>the</strong> heat removal by <strong>the</strong> oil system were<br />

reviewed to determine if a better <strong>the</strong>rmal coupling<br />

could have developed between <strong>the</strong> pump tank and<br />

<strong>the</strong> shield-plug oil cooler. No evidence of increased<br />

heat removal by <strong>the</strong> oil system was found.<br />

The temperature distribution remained essentially<br />

<strong>the</strong> same throughout run 11, with pump operation<br />

continuing without cooling air. When <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

was taken to power in run 12, <strong>the</strong> full-power temperature<br />

distribution had shifted downward ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

15 to 30°F, and <strong>the</strong> pump tank continued through<br />

'MSX Program Semiann. Progr. Rept. Feb. 28; 1967,<br />

<strong>ORNL</strong>-4119, p. 19.<br />

'Ibid., p. 18.<br />

22<br />

<strong>the</strong> run at <strong>the</strong> lower temperatures. The tempera-<br />

tures at zero power were consistent with <strong>the</strong> run<br />

11 zero-power data. This would seein to indicate<br />

that less fission product activity was being re-<br />

leased in <strong>the</strong> pump tank. The lower temperatures<br />

are not detrimental to <strong>the</strong> operation or to <strong>the</strong> life<br />

of <strong>the</strong> pump tank,<br />

Thermal Cycle History<br />

The accumulated <strong>the</strong>rmal cycle history of <strong>the</strong><br />

various components sensitive to <strong>the</strong>rmal cycle<br />

damage is shown in Table 1.2. Approximately 63%<br />

of <strong>the</strong> design <strong>the</strong>rinal cycle life of <strong>the</strong> fuel system<br />

freeze flanges has been used to date; 54% had<br />

been used at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> previous semiannual<br />

report.<br />

Temperature Meosurernent<br />

Sa It Systems. -- Approxiinately 330 <strong>the</strong>rmocouples<br />

are used to tne'asure <strong>the</strong> temperatiire at various<br />

locations on <strong>the</strong> fuel and coolant circulating salt<br />

systems. Only two <strong>the</strong>rmocouple wells are pro-<br />

vided, one each in <strong>the</strong> coolant radiator inlet and<br />

outlet pipes. The remaining <strong>the</strong>rmocouples are<br />

attached to <strong>the</strong> pipe or vessel walls. The <strong>the</strong>rmo-<br />

couples on <strong>the</strong> radiator tubes are insulated to pro-<br />

tect <strong>the</strong>m from <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> high-velocity air<br />

that flows over <strong>the</strong>m during power operation; <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs are not insulated and thus are subject to<br />

error because of exposure to heater shine aild to<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmal convection flow of <strong>the</strong> cell atmosphere<br />

within <strong>the</strong> heater insulation. In March 1965, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> fuel and coolant systems circulating salt at<br />

iso<strong>the</strong>rmal conditions, a complete set of readings<br />

was taken from all <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmocouples that should<br />

read <strong>the</strong> temperature of <strong>the</strong> circulating salt. A<br />

similar set of data was taken in June 1967 at <strong>the</strong><br />

start of run 12. The results of <strong>the</strong> two sets of<br />

measurements are shown in 'Table 1.3. Compari-<br />

son of <strong>the</strong> standard deviations for <strong>the</strong> radiator<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocouples with those for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rmo-<br />

couples shows <strong>the</strong> effect of insulation on reducing<br />

<strong>the</strong> scatter. Comparison of <strong>the</strong> sets of data taken<br />

ovei two years apart shows very little change,<br />

certainly no greater scatter. Figure 1.9 shows<br />

that <strong>the</strong> statistical distribution of <strong>the</strong> deviations<br />

31bid., p. 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!