ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
March 17 following the fission product leak. At full power, temperatures in the fuel salt ranged from -,, 545OC in the cold leg return line up to *72OoC in the core outlet pipe. Since nuclear heat was removed through the core graphite to the cooling coils around the outside of the Hastelloy N core body, the graphite temperature was 55OoC, or some 7OoC below the average fuel salt temperature in the core. Temperatures of the metal walls of the component parts of the loop (Hastelloy N) ranged from a low of 51OOC in the core body (where maximum cooling was used) to -73OOC in the core outlet pipe, where there were no provisions for cooling. The temperature distribution of the salt and loop components was significantly altered when the reactor was down. Under this condition, salt temperatures ranged between rv 535OC in the coldleg return line to -670°C in the top of the core graphite fuel passages. The core outlet pipe was 67OOC with no nuclear heat, as compared with "73OoC for full power operation. The core outlet pipe temperature of 73OOC is believed to have contributed to the outlet pipe failure as discussed in a following section. 15.4 SALT CIRCULATION BY CONVECTION In the first in-pile molten-salt convection loop, the salt circulation rate of 5 to 10 cm3/min was substantially below the calculated rate of -45 cm 3/min at operating temperature, and frequent loss of flow occurred. In order to improve salt circulation rate and reliability in the second loop, the salt flow channels at the top and bottom of the graphite core were redesigned to increase the flow area and improve the flow path (refer to Fig. 15.2). Further, the top and bottom of the core section that were horizontally oriented in the first loop were inclined So to minimize trap- ping of any gas released from the salt, since it is believed that formation of gas pockets often re- sulted in flow stoppage. Salt circulation in the second loop was estimated to be 30 to 40 cm3/min; this was determined by making heat-balance measurements around the cold-leg return line and by adding an increment of heat in a stepwise fashion to one point in the loop and recording the time required for the heated salt to traverse a known distance as monitored by thermocouples around the loop circuit. This flow 180 rate is a fivefold increase over that observed in the first loop and is attributed to the modification described. However, occasional loss of flow still occurred. One possible explanation for this is that a sufficient temperature difference was not maintained between the salt in the hot and cold legs. This is supported by the fact that flow, when lost, could be restored by adjusting the temperatures around the loop circuit. Since oc- casional flow loss did not adversely affect in-pile operation, this was not considered to be a problem of any serious consequence. 15.5 NUCLEAR HEAT, NEUTRON FLUX, AND SALT POWER DENSITY Nuclear heat was determined at various loop positions by comparing electric heat input and cooling rates with the reactor down and at full power (30 Mw). Figure 15.3 shows the results of these measurements. Although nuclear heat meas- urements based on such heat balances are not precise because of variations in the temperature distribution around the loop and variations in heat loss at different loop positions (different power levels) as well as necessary estimates of the exact inlet and outlet temperatures of the several air-water coolant mixtures, they provided a good basis for determining nuclear heat and resultant fission-power density during operation. Based on these determinations, reactor gamma heat with the loop fully inserted and filled with unfueled salt was 4200 w. Fission heat was computed by sub- tracting this value from the total heat generation obtained when fuel salt was in the loop. In the earlier part of the operation with fueled salt (1.73 mole % U), the loop contained 17.84 g of uranium, 93% enriched, in a salt volume of 76.2 cc. A fission heat of 8600 w in the fully inserted position was determined, leading to an estimate of the average thermal neutron flux of 1.18 x 10l3 neutrons cm-* sec-', or an average fuel-salt power density of 113 w/cc. Assuming from a neutron transport calculation by H. F. Bauman that the core/average flux ratio was 1.33, the average power density in the core salt was 150 w/cc at full power. The power density in the forward core tubes is estimated by using Bauman's results to be 180 w/cc. The average thermal neutron flux in the salt was also independently determined from flux monitors
0 9 N L- DWG 67- 1 183 3 I 23 43 63 a3 40 3 42 3 LOOP POSIlION-DISIANCE FROM REACTOR TANK TO LOOP CORE CFNTER (in) Fig. 15.3. Nuclear Heat Generation in Molten-Snlt Loop 2. recovered during postirradiation disassembly of the loop and from the fission product activity in the final salt samples, as discussed below. Calculatioiis involving activity of type 304 stainless steel monitor wires or of fission products in salt samples required taking into account the relative flux history for the particular isotopc as described in the section on activity calculation. Thermal neutron flux levels calculated from type 304 stainless steel monitor wires attached to various regions on the outside of the loop were (in units of neutrons sec- '>: core sliell, front, 4.4 to 5.5 x cole shell, bottom (rear to front), 1.7 to 3.8 x 1013; central well in core graphite, 2.7 to 3.4 x core shell, rear, 1.4 to 1.9 x IOi3; gas separation tank, 1.4 to 2.6 x 10 13. Applying a calculated attenuation factor of 0.6 and a fuel blackness factor of 0.8 to a 181 ~ . Table 15.2. Mean Neutron Flux in Salt as Calculated Isotope from Fission Product Activity Flux Estimate (neutrons cm-' sec-') __.__.I_._ Sample 23 Sample 26 . . . ... .. . . . .. . . . . . ... . ..... .-..... . 30-y 137Cs (6.0%) 281-d 144Ce (5.6%) 65-d "2, (6.3%) 58.3-d 'lY (5.8%) 50.4-d "Sr (4.79%) 32.8-d 141Ce (6.Ouibj 12.8-d 140€3a (6.4%) 11.1-d 14'Nd (2.6%) 10'3 x 1013 0.82 0.93 0.65 1.14 0.61 0.64 0.27 0.59 0.90 1.05 0.96 0.58 0.76 0.70 0.28 0.66 weighted mean monitor flux of 2.4 x 1013 results in an estimated mean flux available to the fuel of 1.15 10'3. The flux was estimated on the basis of the activity of vari-ous fission products in final salt samples after accounting for the relative flux history of the salt. Table 15.2 shows flux estimates based on the activity of a number of isotopes that might be expected to remain in the salt. As is frequently the case, the flux estimates based on fission product activity in salt samples are somewhat lower than the values obtained in other ways. Generally, chemical separations are used prior to counting. Because of favorable halflives, well-established constants, low neutron cross sections, good separations, and less interference from other isotopes in counting, ' 37Cs, '44Ce, and "Zr are regarded as the more reliable measures of fissions (or flux). The average of the flux estimates for these three isotopes is 0.88 x 1013. The results from the different methods of esti- mating flux are compared in Table 15.3. The value of 0.88 x IOi3 obtained from the fission product activity is the most direct measure of fissions in the fuel, and, therefore, it will be used in estimates of the expected activity of other fission products produced in the hop. Evidence of corrosion was obtained from chemi- cal analysis of salt samples withdrawn from the
- Page 140 and 141: (e.g., in metallic colloidal aggreg
- Page 142 and 143: SAMPLES in. DlAM X t'46 in. ,,/NOR-
- Page 144 and 145: c( 0 c c 0 134
- Page 146 and 147: 10.1 OXIDE CHEMISTRY OF ThF,-UF, ME
- Page 148 and 149: BeF, in 2LiF 13eF,, this partial pr
- Page 150 and 151: (up to one week) the transparency o
- Page 152 and 153: The appearance in appreciable conce
- Page 154 and 155: MoF3 e h l o .... ~~ .... Mo t MoF,
- Page 156 and 157: i observed peak heights for Mo 2F9
- Page 158 and 159: 12.1 EXTRACT] ROTACTlNlUM FROM ever
- Page 160 and 161: 2 a STATIC -~ -0 AGITATED A AVERAGE
- Page 162 and 163: to the end of the nickel anode. A m
- Page 164 and 165: centration (97% removed). The distr
- Page 166 and 167: point marked with a cross is the va
- Page 168 and 169: 13. FB u orate 13.1 PHASE RELATIONS
- Page 170 and 171: THERMOCOUPI-F FURNACE I TO VACUUM O
- Page 172 and 173: Cr Metal Hastelloy N Fe Mo ~ 162 Ta
- Page 174 and 175: - 0 0.44 0.40 0.36 0.32 .- + z 0.28
- Page 176 and 177: . Development and E aluation of for
- Page 178 and 179: Sample No. M Wil 1 FP-9-4 FP-10-25
- Page 180 and 181: LJ !+€AD POT I I I I I I I I 1 I
- Page 182 and 183: This uranium species disappeared sl
- Page 184 and 185: 174 BI I - CARRIER - ...... -+ SAMP
- Page 186 and 187: olten- I rr Molten-salt breeder rea
- Page 188 and 189: I COLD LEG RETURN LIN 178 CORE OUTL
- Page 192 and 193: Table 15.3. Comparison of Values fo
- Page 194 and 195: likely cause of failure is the rapi
- Page 196 and 197: 186 Fig. 15.6. Inner Surfoce of Col
- Page 198 and 199: 188 Fig. 15.8. Inner Surface of Cor
- Page 200 and 201: on final salt samples. 'This value
- Page 202 and 203: P c9 P 082 P 8'ZF P 1.11 .c OF P S0
- Page 204 and 205: HFIR FUEL ELLEMENT ,EXPERIMEUT 194
- Page 206 and 207: Our materials program has been conc
- Page 208 and 209: 198 SPLIT STRAP SLEEVE BAND (a) S F
- Page 210 and 211: others, but all three stringers in
- Page 212 and 213: - Y) a - 70 60 50 40 (0 m 30 + m 20
- Page 214 and 215: 204 Fig. 16.7. Photomicrographs of
- Page 216: 206 Fig. 16.9. Photomicrographs of
- Page 219 and 220: AXF-5QRG 4-4 4 a9g/rm3 4f 56 % ~ AX
- Page 221 and 222: Carbon Corporation, Poco Graphite,
- Page 223 and 224: was found. In view of the low react
- Page 225 and 226: SIC TEMPERATURE STAINLESS STEEL TUB
- Page 227 and 228: 18.1. IMPRQVING THE RESISTANCE are
- Page 229 and 230: These aging studies will be expande
- Page 231 and 232: 221 Fig. 18.3. Hastellay N Containi
- Page 233 and 234: Fig. 18.5. Hasvellcy N (Titanium Mo
- Page 235 and 236: ORWL-DWG 67-tIP39 !-in -THICK PLATE
- Page 237 and 238: 227 Toble 18.3. Thermal Convection
- Page 239 and 240: 229 ORNL-DWG 67-io980 Impurity Anal
0 9 N L- DWG 67- 1 183 3<br />
I<br />
23 43 63 a3 40 3 42 3<br />
LOOP POSIlION-DISIANCE FROM REACTOR TANK TO LOOP<br />
CORE CFNTER (in)<br />
Fig. 15.3. Nuclear Heat Generation in <strong>Molten</strong>-Snlt<br />
Loop 2.<br />
recovered during postirradiation disassembly of<br />
<strong>the</strong> loop and from <strong>the</strong> fission product activity in<br />
<strong>the</strong> final salt samples, as discussed below.<br />
Calculatioiis involving activity of type 304<br />
stainless steel monitor wires or of fission products<br />
in salt samples required taking into account <strong>the</strong><br />
relative flux history for <strong>the</strong> particular isotopc as<br />
described in <strong>the</strong> section on activity calculation.<br />
Thermal neutron flux levels calculated from type<br />
304 stainless steel monitor wires attached to<br />
various regions on <strong>the</strong> outside of <strong>the</strong> loop were<br />
(in units of neutrons sec- '>: core sliell,<br />
front, 4.4 to 5.5 x cole shell, bottom (rear to<br />
front), 1.7 to 3.8 x 1013; central well in core<br />
graphite, 2.7 to 3.4 x core shell, rear, 1.4<br />
to 1.9 x IOi3; gas separation tank, 1.4 to 2.6 x<br />
10 13. Applying a calculated attenuation factor<br />
of 0.6 and a fuel blackness factor of 0.8 to a<br />
181<br />
~ .<br />
Table 15.2. Mean Neutron Flux in <strong>Salt</strong> as Calculated<br />
Isotope<br />
from Fission Product Activity<br />
Flux Estimate<br />
(neutrons cm-' sec-')<br />
__.__.I_._<br />
Sample 23 Sample 26<br />
. . . ... .. . . . .. . . . . . ... . ..... .-..... .<br />
30-y 137Cs (6.0%)<br />
281-d 144Ce (5.6%)<br />
65-d "2, (6.3%)<br />
58.3-d 'lY (5.8%)<br />
50.4-d "Sr (4.79%)<br />
32.8-d 141Ce (6.Ouibj<br />
12.8-d 140€3a (6.4%)<br />
11.1-d 14'Nd (2.6%)<br />
10'3 x 1013<br />
0.82<br />
0.93<br />
0.65<br />
1.14<br />
0.61<br />
0.64<br />
0.27<br />
0.59<br />
0.90<br />
1.05<br />
0.96<br />
0.58<br />
0.76<br />
0.70<br />
0.28<br />
0.66<br />
weighted mean monitor flux of 2.4 x 1013 results<br />
in an estimated mean flux available to <strong>the</strong> fuel of<br />
1.15 10'3.<br />
The flux was estimated on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong><br />
activity of vari-ous fission products in final salt<br />
samples after accounting for <strong>the</strong> relative flux<br />
history of <strong>the</strong> salt. Table 15.2 shows flux estimates<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> activity of a number of isotopes<br />
that might be expected to remain in <strong>the</strong> salt.<br />
As is frequently <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> flux estimates<br />
based on fission product activity in salt samples<br />
are somewhat lower than <strong>the</strong> values obtained in<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r ways. Generally, chemical separations are<br />
used prior to counting. Because of favorable halflives,<br />
well-established constants, low neutron<br />
cross sections, good separations, and less interference<br />
from o<strong>the</strong>r isotopes in counting, ' 37Cs,<br />
'44Ce, and "Zr are regarded as <strong>the</strong> more reliable<br />
measures of fissions (or flux). The average of <strong>the</strong><br />
flux estimates for <strong>the</strong>se three isotopes is 0.88 x<br />
1013.<br />
The results from <strong>the</strong> different methods of esti-<br />
mating flux are compared in Table 15.3. The<br />
value of 0.88 x IOi3 obtained from <strong>the</strong> fission<br />
product activity is <strong>the</strong> most direct measure of<br />
fissions in <strong>the</strong> fuel, and, <strong>the</strong>refore, it will be used<br />
in estimates of <strong>the</strong> expected activity of o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
fission products produced in <strong>the</strong> hop.<br />
Evidence of corrosion was obtained from chemi-<br />
cal analysis of salt samples withdrawn from <strong>the</strong>