ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

moltensalt.org
from moltensalt.org More from this publisher
05.08.2013 Views

I COLD LEG RETURN LIN 178 CORE OUTLET 7 PHOTO 74244 Fig. 15.2. Photograph of Partially Assembled In-Pile Convection Loop 2 Showing Design of Solt Flow Channels in Graphite Core. January 16, 1967, after the reactor was brought to its full power of 30 Mw. Loop operation was continued with solvent salt under irradiation at temperatures ranging between 550 and 650'C. During this period the equipment and instrumenta- tion were calibrated and tested, loop performance was evaluated, and reactor gamma heat was de- termined as a function of the depth of insertion of the loop into the beam hole. Loop operation was during this period, and on iF-UF, (63-27 mole %) eutec- tic fuel (93% 235U) was added, along with addi- tional solvent salt, resulting in a fuel composi- tion of 7LiF-BeF,-ZrF ,-UF, of 65.26-28.7-4.84- 1.73 mole %. The nuclear heat generated in the loop (fission plus gamma) was again determined as a function of the dep insertion, two fuel salt samples were removed m the loop, and on February 21, 1967, op ion at the fully inserted, highest flux position was achieved. Operation in the highest flux position was continued to the end of ORR cycle No. 71 (March 5, 1967). The ORR was down from March 5 until March 11, 1967, for the regular between-cycle maintenance and refueling operations. Loop operation con- tinued throughout t period. A fuel salt sample was removed, and, by the addition of eutectic fuel and solvent salt, the uranium concentration of the fuel salt in the loop was increased to the position of 7LiF-BeF,-ZrF,-UF, of 65.4- 8-4.8-2.0 mole 76 in order to attain the experimental objective of 200 w/cc fission-power densities in the fuel salt. Also a sample of the cover gas in the loop was taken for analysis. The ORR was brought to full power of 30 Mw on March 11, 1967. When the molten-salt loop was placed in the fully inserted, highest flux position on March 14, 1967, it was found that the fuel fission-power density in the graphite core was 150 w/cc instead of the expected 200 w/cc. This resulted from a rearrangement of the ORR fuel between cycles 71 and 72 which caused a reduction in thermal flux in beam hole HN-1 in an amount sufficient to compensate for the increased uranium in the loop fuel salt. This reduction in flux was qualitatively confirmed by other experimenters in an adjacent beam hole facility. When the ORR was started up on March 11, 1967, it was observed that the radiation monitor on a charcoal trap in the loop container sweep-gas line read 5 mr/hr, whereas normally this monitor read zero. We conclude activity was caused by r Om primary coolant wa product leakage from the loop into the secondary containment, and loop operation was continued.

Shortly after full power operation was reached on March 14, the radiation monitor on the charcoal trap in the container sweep-gas line increased to 18 mr/hr. Some 8 hr later a further increase to -3.4 r/hr was noted. No further increase occurred until March 17, when the radiation from the charcoal trap increased rapidly (over a period of -3 hr) to -100 r/hr, indicating a significant leakage of fission products from the loop. At this point the loop was retracted out of the high-flux region to a position at 1 to 2% of the highest flux, and the fuel salt in the loop was frozen by reducing the loop temperatures to -400°C in order to prevent possible saIt leakage from the loop. As a result of these actions, the charcoal trap activity decreased to 1 r/hr over a 15-hr period. From March 17 to March 23, 1967, the loop was operated in a retracted position at 1 to 2% of full power, and the fuel salt was kept frozen at a temperature of 350 to 4OO0C, except for brief periods of melting to determine the location of the leak. It was concluded that the fission prod- uct leak was in the vicinity of the gas separation tank and that loop operation could not be con- tinued. Three fuel salt samples were removed from the loop during this period. Beginning on March 27, 1967, the fuel salt was drained from the loop by sampling to facilitate the removal of the loop from the reactor and subse- quent examination in hot-cell facilities. By this procedure the fuel salt inventory in the loop was Ou t-of-Pile Flush Solvent salt In-Pile Preirradiation Solvent salt Fueled salt Retracted-fuel removala Total 179 reduced from 151.6 g to 2.1 g, requiring ten sam- ples (12 to 25 g per sample). On April 4, 1967, the ORR was shut down, and on April 5, 1967, the loop package was removed from the reactor into a shielded carrier and transferred into a hot cell without difficulty . During the in-pile operating period, fuel salt containing enriched uranium was exposed to re- actor irradiation for 1366 hr at average fission- power densities up to 150 w/cc in the graphite core fuel channels. For both out-of-pile and in- pile operating periods, various salt additions and removals were made, including samples for analy- sis. During the in-pile period, the reactor power was altered appreciably 38 times, and the distance of the loop from the reactor lattice, that is, the loop position, was changed 122 times. Thus, the equivalent time at full loop power during fueled operation was 547 hr, while the ORR was operated for 937 hr. Table 15.1 summarizes the operating periods under the various conditions for molten- salt loop No. 2. Details of some of the more significant observa tions made during operation and results of hotcell examinations and analyses are given in sections which follow. 15.3 OPERATING TEMPERATURES The salt in the loop was kept molten (> 490OC) during all in-pile operations until it was frozen on Table 15.1. Summary of Operating Periods for In-Pile Molten-Salt Loop 2 Operating Period (hr) Total Irradiation 77.8 171.9 73.7 343.8 339.5 1101.9 937.4 435.0 428.3 2204.1 1705.2 Full Power Dose Equivalent Salt Additions and Withdrawals Additions Samples Salt Removal 7 5 1 136.0 1 547 .o 2 11.2 0 - - 694.2 16 aMaintained at 350 to 4OO0C (frozen) except during salt-removal operations and fission product leak investiga- tions. 1 1 2 2 3 4 - 13 13 0 0 0 0 9 - 22

Shortly after full power operation was reached on<br />

March 14, <strong>the</strong> radiation monitor on <strong>the</strong> charcoal<br />

trap in <strong>the</strong> container sweep-gas line increased to<br />

18 mr/hr. Some 8 hr later a fur<strong>the</strong>r increase to<br />

-3.4 r/hr was noted. No fur<strong>the</strong>r increase occurred<br />

until March 17, when <strong>the</strong> radiation from <strong>the</strong><br />

charcoal trap increased rapidly (over a period of<br />

-3 hr) to -100 r/hr, indicating a significant<br />

leakage of fission products from <strong>the</strong> loop. At this<br />

point <strong>the</strong> loop was retracted out of <strong>the</strong> high-flux<br />

region to a position at 1 to 2% of <strong>the</strong> highest flux,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> fuel salt in <strong>the</strong> loop was frozen by reducing<br />

<strong>the</strong> loop temperatures to -400°C in order<br />

to prevent possible saIt leakage from <strong>the</strong> loop.<br />

As a result of <strong>the</strong>se actions, <strong>the</strong> charcoal trap<br />

activity decreased to 1 r/hr over a 15-hr period.<br />

From March 17 to March 23, 1967, <strong>the</strong> loop was<br />

operated in a retracted position at 1 to 2% of full<br />

power, and <strong>the</strong> fuel salt was kept frozen at a<br />

temperature of 350 to 4OO0C, except for brief<br />

periods of melting to determine <strong>the</strong> location of<br />

<strong>the</strong> leak. It was concluded that <strong>the</strong> fission prod-<br />

uct leak was in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>the</strong> gas separation<br />

tank and that loop operation could not be con-<br />

tinued. Three fuel salt samples were removed<br />

from <strong>the</strong> loop during this period.<br />

Beginning on March 27, 1967, <strong>the</strong> fuel salt was<br />

drained from <strong>the</strong> loop by sampling to facilitate <strong>the</strong><br />

removal of <strong>the</strong> loop from <strong>the</strong> reactor and subse-<br />

quent examination in hot-cell facilities. By this<br />

procedure <strong>the</strong> fuel salt inventory in <strong>the</strong> loop was<br />

Ou t-of-Pile<br />

Flush<br />

Solvent salt<br />

In-Pile<br />

Preirradiation<br />

Solvent salt<br />

Fueled salt<br />

Retracted-fuel removala<br />

Total<br />

179<br />

reduced from 151.6 g to 2.1 g, requiring ten sam-<br />

ples (12 to 25 g per sample). On April 4, 1967,<br />

<strong>the</strong> ORR was shut down, and on April 5, 1967, <strong>the</strong><br />

loop package was removed from <strong>the</strong> reactor into a<br />

shielded carrier and transferred into a hot cell<br />

without difficulty .<br />

During <strong>the</strong> in-pile operating period, fuel salt<br />

containing enriched uranium was exposed to re-<br />

actor irradiation for 1366 hr at average fission-<br />

power densities up to 150 w/cc in <strong>the</strong> graphite<br />

core fuel channels. For both out-of-pile and in-<br />

pile operating periods, various salt additions and<br />

removals were made, including samples for analy-<br />

sis. During <strong>the</strong> in-pile period, <strong>the</strong> reactor power<br />

was altered appreciably 38 times, and <strong>the</strong> distance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> loop from <strong>the</strong> reactor lattice, that is, <strong>the</strong><br />

loop position, was changed 122 times. Thus, <strong>the</strong><br />

equivalent time at full loop power during fueled<br />

operation was 547 hr, while <strong>the</strong> ORR was operated<br />

for 937 hr. Table 15.1 summarizes <strong>the</strong> operating<br />

periods under <strong>the</strong> various conditions for molten-<br />

salt loop No. 2.<br />

Details of some of <strong>the</strong> more significant observa<br />

tions made during operation and results of hotcell<br />

examinations and analyses are given in<br />

sections which follow.<br />

15.3 OPERATING TEMPERATURES<br />

The salt in <strong>the</strong> loop was kept molten (> 490OC)<br />

during all in-pile operations until it was frozen on<br />

Table 15.1. Summary of Operating Periods for In-Pile <strong>Molten</strong>-<strong>Salt</strong> Loop 2<br />

Operating Period (hr)<br />

Total Irradiation<br />

77.8<br />

171.9<br />

73.7<br />

343.8 339.5<br />

1101.9 937.4<br />

435.0 428.3<br />

2204.1 1705.2<br />

Full Power<br />

Dose Equivalent<br />

<strong>Salt</strong> Additions and Withdrawals<br />

Additions Samples <strong>Salt</strong> Removal<br />

7<br />

5<br />

1<br />

136.0 1<br />

547 .o 2<br />

11.2 0<br />

- -<br />

694.2 16<br />

aMaintained at 350 to 4OO0C (frozen) except during salt-removal operations and fission product leak investiga-<br />

tions.<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

-<br />

13<br />

13<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

9<br />

-<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!