05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-4191 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sample No. M Wil 1<br />

FP-9-4<br />

FP-10-25<br />

FP-11-5<br />

FP-11-13<br />

FP-11-32<br />

FP-11-38<br />

FP-I 1-49<br />

FP-12-6<br />

FP-12-11<br />

FP-12-21<br />

10,978<br />

16,450<br />

17,743<br />

20,386<br />

25,510<br />

27,065<br />

30,000<br />

32,450<br />

33,095<br />

35.649<br />

168<br />

Table 14.2, Concentration of U3+ in MSRE Fuel <strong>Salt</strong><br />

4u3+ Rumup<br />

Oxidation<br />

(equivalents)<br />

~~~<br />

1.87<br />

0.93<br />

0.40<br />

0.26<br />

0.88<br />

0.26<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

a. 10<br />

0.50<br />

If <strong>the</strong> induction period for <strong>the</strong> radiolytic generation<br />

of fluorine were shortened due to <strong>the</strong> increased<br />

activity level of <strong>the</strong> sample, <strong>the</strong> fluorine evolved<br />

during <strong>the</strong> loading of <strong>the</strong> sample could react with<br />

<strong>the</strong> inner walls of <strong>the</strong> Monel hydrogenation vessel.<br />

The copper and nickel fluorides formed would be<br />

subsequently reduced during <strong>the</strong> hydrogemation<br />

steps to produce HF.<br />

The above hypo<strong>the</strong>sis appears to be supported<br />

by <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> following experiment. One<br />

of <strong>the</strong> samples which produced <strong>the</strong> high HF yields<br />

was allowed to stand in <strong>the</strong> hydrogenator at room<br />

temperature for about a week. The sample was<br />

<strong>the</strong>n subjected to additional hydrogenation steps,<br />

and ISF was produced in quantities comparable<br />

with that obtained in <strong>the</strong> original runs. After<br />

standing several iiiore days at room temperature,<br />

<strong>the</strong> sample was removed from <strong>the</strong> hydrogenator.<br />

Smaller but significant quantities of HF were<br />

obtained when <strong>the</strong> empty hydrogenator was<br />

subjected to <strong>the</strong> high-temperature hydrogenation<br />

procedure.<br />

The last three samples, FP-12-6, FP-12-11, and<br />

FP-12-21, wexe all taken after a relatively brief<br />

period of reactor operation following a lengthy<br />

reactor shutdown period. None of <strong>the</strong>se analyses<br />

produced <strong>the</strong> excessively high I-IF yields which<br />

were observed for <strong>the</strong> previous two samples. This<br />

appears to be fur<strong>the</strong>r confirmation that <strong>the</strong> excessive<br />

HF yields resulted from a buildup in sample<br />

activity with extended reactor operation.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> first addition of beryllium to <strong>the</strong> fuel,<br />

not obviously affected<br />

all <strong>the</strong> determinations of U +<br />

Be<br />

Added<br />

(equivalents)<br />

~~~<br />

3.61<br />

2.59<br />

1.86<br />

3.95<br />

1.14<br />

3+<br />

U ”total’<br />

Ca lcii 1 at ed<br />

(70)<br />

- ~~<br />

~<br />

0.31<br />

0.58<br />

0.54<br />

0.77<br />

0.69<br />

0.66<br />

0.80<br />

0.76<br />

1.14<br />

1.54<br />

3+<br />

U /Utotal, Analysis (%)<br />

Step 111<br />

0<br />

0.35<br />

0.37<br />

0.37<br />

0.33<br />

0.42<br />

0.38<br />

0.39<br />

Step IV<br />

~~ ~<br />

0.1<br />

0.45<br />

0.37<br />

0.42<br />

0.34<br />

0.37<br />

1.2<br />

0.50<br />

by radioactivity have fallen in <strong>the</strong> 0.33 to 0.50%<br />

range (<strong>the</strong> one result of sample FP-12-11 could be<br />

explained by a leaky valve) and do not reflect <strong>the</strong><br />

beryllium additions in <strong>the</strong> periods between <strong>the</strong><br />

samplings. This could be accounted for by <strong>the</strong><br />

evolution of fluorine in much smaller quantities<br />

than appeared to be <strong>the</strong> case in samples FP-11-38<br />

and FP-11-39. If this is <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> only permanent<br />

solution would be to maintain <strong>the</strong> samples<br />

at 20OOC during <strong>the</strong> lime of transfer to <strong>the</strong> hot<br />

cell for analysis. However, an apparatus is now<br />

being designed which will pertiiit <strong>the</strong> hydrogenation<br />

of syn<strong>the</strong>tic fuel samples under carefully controlled<br />

conditions. It is felt that this experiment will<br />

provide a check of <strong>the</strong> validity of <strong>the</strong> transpiration<br />

method and will give fur<strong>the</strong>r evidence as to whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

or not <strong>the</strong> fluorine evolution is a real problem.<br />

Experimental work is also being carried out to<br />

develop a method for <strong>the</strong> remote measurement of<br />

ppm concentrations of HF in helium or hydrogen<br />

gas streams. The technique is primarily for application<br />

to <strong>the</strong> U3 i~ transpiration experiment but, if<br />

successful, should also be applicable to <strong>the</strong> determination<br />

of HF in <strong>the</strong> MSRE off-gas. The method<br />

is based on <strong>the</strong> collection of HF on a small NaF<br />

trap which is held at 70°C to prevent <strong>the</strong> adsorption<br />

of water. ‘This is followed by a desorption at<br />

a higher temperature to give a concentrated pulse<br />

of HF that can be measured by <strong>the</strong>rmal conductivity<br />

techniques.<br />

A cornponents testing facility has been set up<br />

which includes a dilution system to produce I~IF<br />

“standards” as low as 20 ppm, a <strong>the</strong>rrnostatted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!