05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. ~.........* . . . . . :*.<br />

... . -,p<br />

, . . . . . .<br />

*.!,A<br />

me technology of<br />

131<br />

6, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

MSRs was under development with U.S. gsverment<br />

funding from 1947 to 1976 with a nominal one-year interruption from 11993<br />

to 1974.<br />

Although no significant effort to commercialize MSRs was in-<br />

volved in this work, a very preliminary conceptual design was generated<br />

for it 10QO-We MSBR, and some alternate fuel cycles were examined. The<br />

current study of denatured PIS& was supported by <strong>the</strong> program (NASAP) to<br />

identify, characterize, and assess pso8igeration-resistant alternatives<br />

to currently projected nuclear power systems.<br />

In principal, MSRs could be operated with a number of fuel cycles<br />

ranging from plutonium-fueled proc~uction of denatured 2 "u, to break-even<br />

breeding with fuel, to high-performance conversion of rhorim to<br />

2 3 3 ~ with denatured 2 3 5 ~ makeup fuel. me last of <strong>the</strong>se cycles currently<br />

appears to be <strong>the</strong> most attractive and is <strong>the</strong> one chosen for characteriza-<br />

tion in this study. The fuel cycle would involve an initial loading of<br />

denatured 235~; operation for ~ Cyears I (at 75% capacity factor) with 2 3 5 ~<br />

makeup, mo fuel discharge, and no chemical treatment for fission-product<br />

removal; and end-of-life storageBdisposa1 of <strong>the</strong> spent fuel. me resource<br />

utilization of this cycle could be significantly enhanced by end-of-life<br />

recovery of <strong>the</strong> denatured uranium in <strong>the</strong> fuel salt via fluorination.<br />

6.1 Reference-Concept DMSR<br />

The differences between a DMSR and <strong>the</strong> conceptual design MSBR in-<br />

volve primarily <strong>the</strong> reactor core and <strong>the</strong> fuel cycle. Thus, <strong>the</strong> rest of<br />

<strong>the</strong> primary circuit (e.g., pumps and heat exchangers) and <strong>the</strong> balance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> plant would be very similar for both concepts, and <strong>the</strong> descrip-<br />

tions developed for <strong>the</strong> MSBR are presumed to be applicable to <strong>the</strong> DMSB.<br />

Minor variatio~s that wight be associated with design optimization are<br />

not considered.<br />

The reactor vessel for <strong>the</strong> DMSR, about 18 m in diameter and 10 m<br />

high, would be substantially larger than that for <strong>the</strong> high-performance<br />

breeder.<br />

This would permit <strong>the</strong> Pow power density required to allow a<br />

38-year life expectancy for <strong>the</strong> reactor graphite and would also reduce

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!