ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
E2 7<br />
There are no detailed estimates of <strong>the</strong> capital or operating costs of<br />
<strong>the</strong> equipment for W-H2 treatment to remove (I2- from <strong>the</strong> small batches of<br />
6<br />
fuel. For this assessment, we assumed that <strong>the</strong> capital cost is $15 x 10<br />
and that its operation costs $500,00O/year.<br />
As a consequence of <strong>the</strong> assumptions and <strong>the</strong> estimates described, <strong>the</strong><br />
cost of producing 6.57 x 10’ kmjyear (operation at 75% plant factor) ap-<br />
parently averages $34,650,000, and <strong>the</strong> resulting fuel cycle cost is about<br />
5.3 mills/krn.<br />
Note that, if <strong>the</strong> price of 7Li were lowered by five-fold [to SO.4O/g<br />
($272/lb)l, <strong>the</strong> resulting fuel cycle cost for <strong>the</strong> once-through DMSR would<br />
fall to sllightby below 4 mills/kkJh.<br />
5.3.5 Net power cost<br />
Because <strong>the</strong> return on <strong>the</strong> plant capital investment woslPd be a sub-<br />
stantial factor in <strong>the</strong> net cost of power from a DMSR and because a number<br />
of terms that would be important in a commercia% plant were omitted in de-<br />
veloping <strong>the</strong> capital cost estimate, projecting a potential net cost for<br />
DMSR power is not appropriate.<br />
Substantially more design and development<br />
would be required to support a reasonably reliable estimate. However, <strong>the</strong><br />
previous discussions suggest that <strong>the</strong> cost of power from a BMSR not<br />
be greatly different than that from o<strong>the</strong>r nuclear systems.<br />
5.4 Licensing<br />
Mthough two experimental MSRs have been built and operated in <strong>the</strong><br />
United States under government ownership, none has ever been subjected to<br />
formal licensing or even detailed review by <strong>the</strong> NRC. As a consequence,<br />
<strong>the</strong> question of lieensability of MSRs remains open; <strong>the</strong> NRC has not yet<br />
identified <strong>the</strong> major licensing issues and <strong>the</strong> concept has not been eon-<br />
sidered by various public interest organizations that are often involved<br />
in nuclear plant licensing procedures. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> licensing experience<br />
of solid-fueled reactors can be used as only a general guide because of<br />
significant fundamental differences between those systems and MSB. Pre-<br />
sumably, MSRs would be required to comply with <strong>the</strong> intents, ra<strong>the</strong>r than