05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and <strong>the</strong> ~ dvent (or carrier) salt and, <strong>the</strong>refo~e, would actually require<br />

a larger uranium supply than <strong>the</strong> 30-year once-through fuel cycle proposed<br />

for <strong>the</strong> reference IBmR concept. However, uranium is easily and effectively<br />

separated frsm <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> fuel mixture, so <strong>the</strong> denatured uranium<br />

could be removed and recycled %e: <strong>the</strong> reactor site with a minimum of ef-<br />

fort. Depending on <strong>the</strong> rate 06 salt replacement, this approach would<br />

significantly reduce <strong>the</strong> requirement for fissile uranium below that fsr<br />

<strong>the</strong> simple once-through cycle<br />

4.2 Fuel Cyde Performance<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> alternate fuel cycles considered in this secti~n, <strong>the</strong> break-<br />

even breeder, if it were successfd, would provide for <strong>the</strong> best utiliza-<br />

tion of fissile fuel resources ~ ~ 3 % ) . ~f that system were started up<br />

on 20% e ~ r i ~ 2h 3 e % ~ ~ it ~ would probably require 700 to 1000 ~g of natu-<br />

ral U308 to provide <strong>the</strong> initial fuel loading for each 1 CX of electric<br />

generating capability. [The separative work to enrich this fuel to 20%<br />

235U would be less than 1 million separative work units (SWU),]<br />

However,<br />

once provided, this fuel would continue to p~~dluce electricity in an arbi-<br />

trarily long succession of power stations (or as long as fertile material<br />

was available). Thus, <strong>the</strong> effective resource requirement could be made<br />

arbitrarily small by averaging It Over iB large number Of plants. Even if<br />

<strong>the</strong> initial fuel charge were used in only one pliant, <strong>the</strong> resource require-<br />

ment would be only 110 to 20% of that for an LWR with similar electric gen-<br />

erating capability.<br />

The converter options with fuel processing provide o<strong>the</strong>r estimates of<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential performance of DMSRs with fissi~n-product cleanup (Table 29).<br />

The options, which were described earlier, my be sumarized as f~klows:<br />

Option Fuel cycle<br />

A<br />

B<br />

c<br />

D<br />

Initial load is 20% 235U; makeup fuel is 20% 235U<br />

Initial load is 20% 235U; makeup fuel is 33% 735U<br />

Initial load is 20% 23sU; annual discard of 1% of uranium inventory;<br />

makeup fuel is 20% 235U<br />

Initial load is 20% 235U; annual reenrichment of 2% of uranium inventory<br />

to denaturin limit or to one-lialf of prior 7 3 8 ~ content;<br />

makeup fuel is 20% 255C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!