ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-TM-7207 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and <strong>the</strong> ~ dvent (or carrier) salt and, <strong>the</strong>refo~e, would actually require<br />
a larger uranium supply than <strong>the</strong> 30-year once-through fuel cycle proposed<br />
for <strong>the</strong> reference IBmR concept. However, uranium is easily and effectively<br />
separated frsm <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> fuel mixture, so <strong>the</strong> denatured uranium<br />
could be removed and recycled %e: <strong>the</strong> reactor site with a minimum of ef-<br />
fort. Depending on <strong>the</strong> rate 06 salt replacement, this approach would<br />
significantly reduce <strong>the</strong> requirement for fissile uranium below that fsr<br />
<strong>the</strong> simple once-through cycle<br />
4.2 Fuel Cyde Performance<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> alternate fuel cycles considered in this secti~n, <strong>the</strong> break-<br />
even breeder, if it were successfd, would provide for <strong>the</strong> best utiliza-<br />
tion of fissile fuel resources ~ ~ 3 % ) . ~f that system were started up<br />
on 20% e ~ r i ~ 2h 3 e % ~ ~ it ~ would probably require 700 to 1000 ~g of natu-<br />
ral U308 to provide <strong>the</strong> initial fuel loading for each 1 CX of electric<br />
generating capability. [The separative work to enrich this fuel to 20%<br />
235U would be less than 1 million separative work units (SWU),]<br />
However,<br />
once provided, this fuel would continue to p~~dluce electricity in an arbi-<br />
trarily long succession of power stations (or as long as fertile material<br />
was available). Thus, <strong>the</strong> effective resource requirement could be made<br />
arbitrarily small by averaging It Over iB large number Of plants. Even if<br />
<strong>the</strong> initial fuel charge were used in only one pliant, <strong>the</strong> resource require-<br />
ment would be only 110 to 20% of that for an LWR with similar electric gen-<br />
erating capability.<br />
The converter options with fuel processing provide o<strong>the</strong>r estimates of<br />
<strong>the</strong> potential performance of DMSRs with fissi~n-product cleanup (Table 29).<br />
The options, which were described earlier, my be sumarized as f~klows:<br />
Option Fuel cycle<br />
A<br />
B<br />
c<br />
D<br />
Initial load is 20% 235U; makeup fuel is 20% 235U<br />
Initial load is 20% 235U; makeup fuel is 33% 735U<br />
Initial load is 20% 23sU; annual discard of 1% of uranium inventory;<br />
makeup fuel is 20% 235U<br />
Initial load is 20% 235U; annual reenrichment of 2% of uranium inventory<br />
to denaturin limit or to one-lialf of prior 7 3 8 ~ content;<br />
makeup fuel is 20% 255C