05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

ANP QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT<br />

19.1<br />

39.0 pg/cm2<br />

tBERYLLIVM INSERT<br />

LENGTH - 3.75 in<br />

ID-04301n<br />

UNCLASSIFIED<br />

<strong>ORNL</strong>-LR-DWG 4650<br />

ution of Beryllium Around an<br />

oop Containing a Beryllium<br />

m. Test period, 270 hr.<br />

g. 6.2. Surfaces of Beryllium Insert from an<br />

nconel Thermal-Convection Loop After Exposure<br />

to Sodium for 1000 hr at 13OO0F. (u) Surface of<br />

beryllium exposed to sodium in annular space.<br />

(b) Surface of beryllium exposed to flowing sodium.<br />

OOX. Reduced 37.5%.<br />

under way to determine <strong>the</strong> minimum spacing that<br />

can be tolerated between beryllium and Inconel.<br />

STATIC CORROSION STUDIES<br />

E. E. Hoffman<br />

W. H. Cook C. F. Leitten<br />

Metallurgy Division<br />

Brazing Alloys on Stainless Steel<br />

Additional tests have been made in an effort to<br />

find a brazing alloy that has good resistance to<br />

both sodium and <strong>the</strong> fuel mixture NaF-ZrF,-UF,<br />

(53.5-40-6.5 mole %). The results reported in Table<br />

6.5 were obtained from tests of type 304 stainless<br />

steel T-joints brazed with <strong>the</strong> alloys listed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Wall Colmonoy Corporation. Tests are also being<br />

conducted on Inconel T-joints brazed with each of<br />

<strong>the</strong> alloys listed in Table 6.5. All <strong>the</strong> brazing<br />

alloys listed had good resistance to <strong>the</strong> fluoride<br />

mixture, but only alloy C-29 had good resistance<br />

to both <strong>the</strong> fluoride mixture and to sodium.<br />

Brazing Alloys on Nickel<br />

A series of T-ioints of A-nickel were brazed with<br />

<strong>the</strong> various alloys listed in Tables 6.6 and 6.7 in<br />

a dry hydrogen atmosphere and were <strong>the</strong>n exposed<br />

for 100 hr to static NaF-ZrF,-UF, (53.5-40-6.5<br />

mole %) at 1500°F or to static sodium hydroxide at<br />

1100 and 15OOOF. The specimens were examined me-<br />

tallographically in <strong>the</strong> as-received condition in<br />

order to evaluate <strong>the</strong> inclusions and <strong>the</strong> porosity.<br />

The brazed specimens were thoroughly cleaned<br />

before and after testing so that Val id weight change<br />

data could be obtained. In order to prevent <strong>the</strong><br />

rounding of <strong>the</strong> fillet edge upon polishing, each<br />

specimen was nickel plated after testing. The<br />

data obtained from metallographic examination of<br />

<strong>the</strong> specimens exposed to <strong>the</strong> fluoride mixture are<br />

presented in Table 6.6, and <strong>the</strong> data on <strong>the</strong> speci-<br />

mens exposed to sodium hydroxide are in Table<br />

6.7.<br />

Most of <strong>the</strong> alloys tested appeared to have good<br />

corrosion resistance to <strong>the</strong> fluoride mixture, except<br />

<strong>the</strong> braze alloy with <strong>the</strong> composition 69% Ni-20%<br />

Cr-ll% Si. Several of <strong>the</strong> brazed T-ioints, especially<br />

those which included copper, gold, or<br />

silicon as an alloying element in <strong>the</strong> braze material,<br />

showed numerous voids in <strong>the</strong> interface between<br />

<strong>the</strong> base material and <strong>the</strong> braze fillet. These voids<br />

are not considered to be caused by <strong>the</strong> attack of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fluoride mixture but ra<strong>the</strong>r by diffusion of a<br />

5 "<br />

3<br />

I<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!