05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANP QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT<br />

- 5<br />

4900<br />

v) 4800<br />

w<br />

a<br />

I- 3<br />

d t700<br />

W<br />

0<br />

B<br />

I- 4600<br />

W<br />

m<br />

I- 3<br />

-I<br />

I-<br />

T3<br />

0<br />

4500<br />

1400<br />

n<br />

z<br />

a<br />

5 4300<br />

5<br />

K<br />

0<br />

9<br />

K<br />

4200<br />

4100<br />

1000<br />

-<br />

<strong>ORNL</strong>-LR-DWG 3946<br />

404 100 96 92 88 84 80 76 72 68 64 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0<br />

TIME (min)<br />

in about 8 min. However, by this time <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

mean temperature was 138OoF, and it was <strong>the</strong>re-<br />

fore decreased (to 1350°F) by inserting <strong>the</strong> shim<br />

rods. The reactor was again brought from low<br />

power to high power in 2 min, and after 8 min at<br />

high power <strong>the</strong> shim rods were withdrawn to in-<br />

crease <strong>the</strong> mean temperature. It is most sig-<br />

nificant that during <strong>the</strong> 2-min interval required to<br />

bring <strong>the</strong> reactor from a nominal power of 100 kw<br />

to 2.5 Mw <strong>the</strong> shortest recorded pile period was<br />

only 14 sec. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, when at high power,<br />

group withdrawal of <strong>the</strong> shim rods (0.02% Ak/sec)<br />

resulted in a pile period of only 10 sec. These<br />

two limiting periods were consistently repro-<br />

ducible.<br />

Additional insight into <strong>the</strong> behavior of <strong>the</strong><br />

negative temperature coefficient is also afforded<br />

by Fig. 1.3. By time 84 min, <strong>the</strong> blower was off<br />

and <strong>the</strong> reactor power was reduced to about<br />

100 kw. The shim rods were <strong>the</strong>n inserted to<br />

make <strong>the</strong> reactor subcritical. At 86 min, <strong>the</strong> fuel<br />

helium blower was turned on. The higher density<br />

14<br />

Fig. 1.3. Power Excursions.<br />

cooled fuel made <strong>the</strong> reactor critical, and in 2 min<br />

a AT of about 200°F was obtained. At this time,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> blower speed was automatically<br />

reduced by a low-temperature signal. The blowers<br />

were subsequently shut off and <strong>the</strong> shims inserted.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> reactor power level had been cali-<br />

'.<br />

brated against <strong>the</strong> activity count of a fuel sample,<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual reactor power remained in doubt through-<br />

out <strong>the</strong> experiment, not only because of uncertainty<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> retention of fission products by <strong>the</strong><br />

fuel but also because of discrepancies in heat<br />

balances in <strong>the</strong> process systems, that is, heat<br />

removed from fuel and sodium vs heat picked up<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir water heat dumps. While <strong>the</strong> causes of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se discrepancies are now being analyzed in 1 -<br />

detail, <strong>the</strong> most reliable estimate of <strong>the</strong> reactor F<br />

power is believed to be that obtained from <strong>the</strong><br />

temperature differences and flows in <strong>the</strong> fuel and<br />

sodium systems. During one typical period of<br />

power operation, <strong>the</strong> fuel AT of 370°F at 45 gpm<br />

accounted for more than 1.9 Mw in <strong>the</strong> fuel, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> sodium AT of 115°F at 150 gpm accounted<br />

- 7<br />

-<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!