05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

measurements taken at <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> detector tank<br />

were considered. For 8 90 deg, <strong>the</strong> experiments<br />

indicate that <strong>the</strong> ng into <strong>the</strong> side and that<br />

into <strong>the</strong> rear of th or tank are approximately<br />

equal. If it is ass hat this is nearly true for<br />

angles between 45 and 90 deg, <strong>the</strong> air scattering<br />

into <strong>the</strong> rear can be estimated from <strong>the</strong> measure-<br />

ments at <strong>the</strong> side. When <strong>the</strong> air-scattered neutron<br />

flux estimated in this manner is a<br />

calculated direct beam flux, <strong>the</strong> dash<br />

Fig. 12.6 is obtained. The fair agreement between<br />

<strong>the</strong> dashed curve he measured curve indicates<br />

that <strong>the</strong> simple used to calculate <strong>the</strong> angle<br />

of distribution of <strong>the</strong> leakoge neutrons from <strong>the</strong><br />

shield surface may be adequate for divided-shield<br />

Figure 12.7 represents an attempt to compare <strong>the</strong><br />

measurements o ft scattering into <strong>the</strong> side of<br />

<strong>the</strong> detector tank he air scattering indicated<br />

by single-scatter lations. The ordinate in<br />

Fig. 12.7 is <strong>the</strong> ratio of <strong>the</strong> flux at <strong>the</strong> side surface<br />

of <strong>the</strong> detector tank for a given beam direction 8 to<br />

<strong>the</strong> flux at <strong>the</strong> re <strong>the</strong> detector tank obtained<br />

I<br />

“0<br />

n<br />

,,--<br />

(-.-* ~. E.-<br />

--.\<br />

‘.._ _.<br />

enmr<br />

2-0(-056-2-T40<br />

u<br />

GEOMETRY FOR SINGLE-SCATTER CALCULATION FOR e= o<br />

I-<br />

0.40<br />

PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 70,1954<br />

when <strong>the</strong> beam is pointed directly towcirds <strong>the</strong><br />

detector tank, that is, for 8 = 0 deg. He,nce, <strong>the</strong><br />

ordinate is a measure of <strong>the</strong> fraction of <strong>the</strong> beam<br />

scattered into <strong>the</strong> sides of <strong>the</strong> detector tank. The<br />

abscissa is <strong>the</strong> beam direction 8. The points indicated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> experiments for 8 = 30 and 90 cfeg were<br />

obtained by extrapolation of <strong>the</strong> fluxes measured<br />

in <strong>the</strong> water to give <strong>the</strong> extrapolated surface values.<br />

The measured relaxation lengths were used in <strong>the</strong><br />

extrapolation; no relaxation length measurements<br />

were made for 8 = 0 deg, and <strong>the</strong>refore this procedure<br />

could not be used for this angle. The only<br />

single-scatter calculation presently available is for<br />

8 = 0 deg, and it is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption of a<br />

2~- isotropic detector, that is, an isotropic detector<br />

with one hemisphere shielded. This calculation<br />

gives a value of 0.048 for 8 = 0 deg, which is to be<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> values indicated by <strong>the</strong> experi-<br />

ments of 0.063 for 8 = 30 deg and 0.048 for 8 = 90<br />

deg. As <strong>the</strong> beam is rotated from 30 to 0 dleg, it is<br />

nearly cut in half insofar as scattering into <strong>the</strong> one<br />

side of <strong>the</strong> detector tank is concerned, md this<br />

should result in a decrease of <strong>the</strong> scattering into<br />

<strong>the</strong> one side of <strong>the</strong> detector tank. The scattered<br />

flux measurements taken within <strong>the</strong> water show<br />

this to be <strong>the</strong> case. The point calculated by<br />

single-scatter <strong>the</strong>ory for 8 = 0 deg appears ‘to agree<br />

with <strong>the</strong> points obtained from <strong>the</strong> experirnent for<br />

8 = 30 and 8 = 90 deg. However, it should be<br />

cautioned that <strong>the</strong> fair agreement indicated in <strong>the</strong><br />

figure could be fortuitous. In <strong>the</strong> comparisbon, <strong>the</strong><br />

assumption is involved that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal flux re-<br />

sulting from a given fast-neutron current into <strong>the</strong><br />

side of <strong>the</strong> detector tank is <strong>the</strong> same for air-scattered<br />

INTERPRETATION OF AIR AND GROUND<br />

SCATTERING AT THE<br />

TOWER SHIELDING FACILITY<br />

itude for two diff<br />

J. Van Hoomissen”<br />

n of reactor-detector<br />

as Indicated by Measurements and by a Single- I5On loan to Tower Shielding Facility frorrl Boeing<br />

Scatter Calculation. Airplane Company.<br />

147<br />

c

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!