05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 -<br />

Z .<br />

*<br />

c<br />

*<br />

i<br />

PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 10,7954<br />

TABLE 11.1. DECONTAMINATION OBTAINED IN THE FLUORIDE-VOLATILITY<br />

PROCESS BY SCRUBBING UF6<br />

Syn<strong>the</strong>tic ARE fuel, prepared by hydrofluorination of 6 g of irradiated<br />

uranium metal in 67 g of NaF-ZrF4 (56-44 mole X), fluorinated at<br />

65OoC with 40- to 80-fold excess fluorine.<br />

Run 1: UF6 product plus excess fluorine passed through 67 g<br />

of molten NaF-ZrF4 at 65OoC into a dry-ice trap and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n resublimed into second trap.<br />

Runs 2 and 3: UF, product separated from excess fluorine in dry-ice<br />

trap and <strong>the</strong>n volatilized through a C8Fl, still into a<br />

second trap.<br />

Beta Decontami nati on Factors<br />

Activity Run 1 Run 2 Run 3<br />

Over-al I Scrub* Over-a1 I Scrub* Over-al I Scrub*<br />

Gross 4800 2.7 290<br />

Ru 350 2.3 16<br />

Zr 3.2 lo4 6.8 x lo4<br />

Nb 1800 47 1200<br />

1.2 250 2.2<br />

14<br />

4.7 lo4<br />

TRE 2 x 106 2 x 10, 2 105<br />

*Decontamination factor calculated for scrub step alone on basis of activity extracted from scrub material.<br />

Scrubbing <strong>the</strong> UF, product from <strong>the</strong> fluorination<br />

and sublimation steps with fluorocarbon (C,Fl,)<br />

did not improve <strong>the</strong> decontamination (runs 2 and 3,<br />

Table 11.1). Approximately 9 g of UF, sublimed<br />

from a fluorination run, was passed into <strong>the</strong> bottom<br />

of a C,F, distillation column (0.5 in. in diameter<br />

by 14 in. high, packed with t2-in. nickel Fenske<br />

helices) that was operating at full reflux at about<br />

gas<br />

had to be refluorinated from <strong>the</strong> NaF bed at 65OOC<br />

before being trapped. However, <strong>the</strong> gross decon-<br />

86<br />

tamination factors in <strong>the</strong> two fractions were of <strong>the</strong><br />

same order, that is, 2 x lo3. The uranium loss on<br />

<strong>the</strong> NaF was only 0.01%. Two experiments were<br />

<strong>the</strong>n performed with 30-9 beds of 20- to 40-mesh<br />

NaF held at 65OOC to eliminate <strong>the</strong> refluorination<br />

step (runs 2 and 3, Table 11.2). The results in<br />

both tests showed high absorption of ru<strong>the</strong>nium<br />

and niobium beta activities, and <strong>the</strong> over-till gross<br />

4<br />

beta decontamination factor was greater than 10 .<br />

eral, 1 to 10% of<br />

Nearly all <strong>the</strong> niobium activity was accounted for<br />

in <strong>the</strong> reactor and fused salt, while 7555 of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!