05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1771 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

ORNL-1771 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

ORNL-1771 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11. SHIELDING ANALYSIS<br />

J. E. Faulkner<br />

H. E. Hungerford<br />

Theoretical analyses have been made so that an<br />

understanding of the air and ground scattering<br />

measurements at the Tower Shielding Facility could<br />

be obtained and the attenuation in the side wall of<br />

an aircraft crew shield could be determined. In<br />

connection with the air and ground scattering analy-<br />

ses, special attention was given to the calculation<br />

of the reduction of air scattering due to ground<br />

interruption and to the effects of multiple scattering.<br />

The gamma-ray slant penetration has been calcu-<br />

lated for the side wall of an aircraft crew shield,<br />

and the variation of radiation intensity throughout<br />

the crew volume has been briefly explored.<br />

SLANT PENETRATION OF COMPOSITE<br />

SLAB SHIELDS BY GAMMA RAYS<br />

C. D. Zerby<br />

The total radiation dose in the crew compartment<br />

of an airplane is partially dependent on the gamma-<br />

ray flux penetrating the compartment shield. To<br />

obtain a fundamental, but practical, knowledge of<br />

the gamma-ray penetrations, the problem has been<br />

treated theoretically by using stochastic, or Monte<br />

Carlo methods.<br />

The problem was programed for solution on the<br />

ORACLE and was arranged for investigating the<br />

effects of the variations of all the parameters in-<br />

volved. The shield was taken as a composite slab<br />

of two materials comprising a thick layer of Compton<br />

scattering material' followed by a thin layer of<br />

lead. In each of many cases the initial incident<br />

photons were taken as monoenergetic and incident<br />

on the slab at a particular angle with the normal to<br />

the slab. The stochastic process used the exacf<br />

physical analog of the probability laws known to<br />

govern the life of a photon.<br />

'In the range of energy considered, the Compton<br />

scatterer has approximately the same physical charoc-<br />

terlstics relative to a photon passing through it as does<br />

coricrete or polyethylene (CH2).<br />

E. P. Blizard<br />

F. H. Murray<br />

C. D. Zerby<br />

Physics Division<br />

H. E. Stern<br />

Consolidated Vu1 tee Aircraft Corporation<br />

The parameters and their variations that have<br />

been investigated to date are listed below:<br />

Thickness of Compton<br />

Thickness of lead, in.<br />

in. 3, 9, 15<br />

bo, 3/10, Y2<br />

3<br />

Initio1 photon energy, mc2 units 2, 6<br />

Initial angle of incidence, deg<br />

0, 30, 60<br />

All combinations of these parameters were investi-<br />

gated.<br />

The following solution of a typical problem indi-<br />

cates part of the information obtained:<br />

Initial Conditions<br />

Results<br />

Thickness of Compton scatterer 3 in.<br />

Thickness of lead<br />

Initial photon energy<br />

>,o in.<br />

6 mc 2<br />

Initial angle of incidence 60 deg<br />

Fraction of initial energy<br />

1. reflected 0.0234<br />

2. absorbed in the Compton scatterer owing<br />

to scattering collisions<br />

0.318<br />

3. absorbed in lead owing to scattering<br />

collisions<br />

0.0568<br />

4. absorbed In lead awing to absorption<br />

cat I is ions<br />

0.0515<br />

5. penetrating shield 0.550<br />

6. penetrating shield without being<br />

degraded in energy<br />

0.435<br />

Energy build-up factor 1.265<br />

The energy spectrum for the reflected photons<br />

was also obtained in this typical problem. The<br />

spectra for the photons penetrating the shield were<br />

obtained in the angle intervals 0 to 15, 15 to 30,<br />

30 to 45, 45 to 60, and 60 to 90 deg. These spectra<br />

will be available in a forthcoming report.<br />

_____ ...... .............<br />

2The electron density of the Compton scatterer was<br />

taken as the same as that for polyethylene.<br />

3Multiply mc 2 units by 0.5108 to obtain MeV.<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!