ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I<br />
A<br />
c e<br />
In order to determine <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> gammaray<br />
dose rate produced by streaming through <strong>the</strong><br />
duct, it was necessary to know <strong>the</strong> dose transmitted<br />
through <strong>the</strong> lead shield, as well as <strong>the</strong> effect of<br />
<strong>the</strong> background produced by adjacent experimental<br />
facilities. Measurements of <strong>the</strong> gamma-ray dose<br />
rates were <strong>the</strong>refore made beyond a solid lead<br />
shield in <strong>the</strong> z,y plane of <strong>the</strong> source at a distance<br />
z above <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> lead (see Fig. 5.3.1). The<br />
experimental data (Fig. 5.3.2) are presented in<br />
terms of <strong>the</strong> ratio of <strong>the</strong> dose rate with <strong>the</strong> duct in<br />
position to <strong>the</strong> dose rate with <strong>the</strong> duct replaced by<br />
a lead plug as a function of distance from <strong>the</strong><br />
duct center line. The ratio of <strong>the</strong> dose rate beyond<br />
a water-filled hole to that beyond <strong>the</strong> solid lead is<br />
also shown in Fig. 5.3.2.<br />
The actual ART duct mockup will consist of two<br />
concentric pipes. The inner one, which will contain<br />
<strong>the</strong> NaK, is not present in <strong>the</strong>se straight-duct<br />
mockups, but it would reduce <strong>the</strong> dose by about<br />
30%. It should also be pointed out that <strong>the</strong> lnconel<br />
pressure shell is not part of <strong>the</strong> mockup shield. If<br />
it were, <strong>the</strong> dose-rate ratios would-be higher by a<br />
factor of approximately 2 for a 1-in.-thick pressure<br />
she1 I.<br />
A ratio of <strong>the</strong> dose rate with <strong>the</strong> aluminum-filled<br />
pipe to that with <strong>the</strong> air-filled pipe was 0.86 on <strong>the</strong><br />
center line, which is in reasonable agreement with<br />
a calculated value. In <strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>the</strong> average<br />
energy of <strong>the</strong> gamma rays was assumed to be 3.5<br />
Mev from <strong>the</strong> composite source. The ratio was<br />
determined from <strong>the</strong> following relation:<br />
- D1 ,. = B(p)e-w ,<br />
where<br />
u2<br />
D, = dose rate with pipefilled with aluminum<br />
turnings (with tungsten collar),<br />
D2 = dose rate through empty pipe (no collar),<br />
x t length of duct (12.8 cm),<br />
p = aluminum linear absorption coefficient<br />
= PmPl<br />
pm = mass absorption coefficient (0.034) for<br />
a rays in aluminum,<br />
minum = 0.85 g/cm3,<br />
B(P) = dose rate buildup factor (1.2).<br />
Thus<br />
n<br />
- "l = 0.83<br />
D2<br />
PERIOD ENDlNC JUNE 70, 7956<br />
o x TRAVERSE, z =<br />
A y TRAVERSE, c = 10 5 cm<br />
nemt<br />
<strong>ORNL</strong>-LR-OW 44896<br />
MINUM-FILLED DUCTS<br />
TRAVERSE,TUNGSTEN COL<br />
RLlNE MEASUREMENT NO COLLAR I = (0.5<br />
-60 40 -20 0 20 40 60<br />
x OR y, DISTANCE FROM DUCT CENTERLINE (cm)<br />
Fig. 5.3.2. Gamma-Ray Dose Rates Beyond<br />
Straight-Thrsugh ART North-Head Duct Mockups<br />
Filled with Air or Aluminum.<br />
as compared with <strong>the</strong> experimental value of 0.86<br />
mentioned above.<br />
It may be seen in Fig. 5.3.2 that <strong>the</strong> tungsten<br />
collar offers little attenuation to <strong>the</strong> dose along<br />
<strong>the</strong> center line of <strong>the</strong> pipe. However, <strong>the</strong> ratio of<br />
<strong>the</strong> dose rates with and without <strong>the</strong> tungsten collar<br />
and aluminum turnings, averaged over <strong>the</strong> emitted<br />
beam, was 1.76. This ratio indicates <strong>the</strong> effective-<br />
ness of <strong>the</strong> tungsten collar in this particular con-<br />
figuration only.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> ART shield design <strong>the</strong> lead shield is fol-<br />
lowed by 31.5 in. (80.0 cm) of water. The vcater<br />
attenuation of <strong>the</strong> gamma-ray beam emerging from<br />
<strong>the</strong> duct mockup (with aluminum turnings and tung-<br />
sten collar) along <strong>the</strong> z axis is shown in Fig.<br />
275