05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANP PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT<br />

ot(E) = microscopic total cross section<br />

at energy E, cm2,<br />

ot(Eo) = microscopic total cross section<br />

at energy, E,, cm2,<br />

9 9<br />

X = scalar distance from source<br />

point measured in units of mean<br />

free path at energy E,,<br />

+<br />

X = position vector from source<br />

point,<br />

f(E,Q,E ',a ') = scattering kernel,<br />

+ +<br />

G(A,E,Q) = particle current, particles per<br />

unit energy at energy E per unit<br />

solid angle in <strong>the</strong> direction 6per<br />

. square mean free path (at energy<br />

. E,) at position A,<br />

+<br />

S(E,Q) = source strength, particles per<br />

unit energy at energy E fer unit<br />

solid angle in direction Q.<br />

Equation 1 is independent of <strong>the</strong> nuclear density<br />

thus G(A,E,H) is also inde-<br />

This means that if two ex-<br />

periments are set up with <strong>the</strong> same point source<br />

but with different densities p1 and p2 and ttie<br />

current is measured in each experiment at positions<br />

such that<br />

<strong>the</strong>n<br />

(3)<br />

The significance of Eg. 3 can be realized if hand<br />

G are reduced to conventional units. The relation<br />

between distance r (measured in centimeters) and<br />

X is given by<br />

9 9<br />

(4) h = No,(E,)r ,<br />

where N is <strong>the</strong> nuclear density of <strong>the</strong> medium. The<br />

conventional particle current can be defined as<br />

F(?,E,~) given in particles per unit energy at<br />

energy E per unit solid angle in direction 6 per<br />

cm2 at position r. The relation between F and G<br />

is <strong>the</strong>n<br />

266<br />

By using Eq. 4, Eq. 2 becomes<br />

9 Nl 9 p1 9<br />

r2 =- r1 = - r1<br />

N2 p2<br />

and by using Eq. 5, Eq. 3 becomes<br />

which is <strong>the</strong> desired transformation. Proper inte-<br />

gration of Eq. 7 gives <strong>the</strong> flux transformation.as<br />

and <strong>the</strong> dose rate transformation as<br />

These transformations can be applied to much of<br />

<strong>the</strong> TSF data, but <strong>the</strong> application is not entirely<br />

general.2 To make full use of <strong>the</strong> transformations<br />

it will be necessary to obtain additional data at<br />

<strong>the</strong> TSF at several separation distances so that<br />

<strong>the</strong> measurements can be interpolated and applied<br />

at any altitude.<br />

ENERGY ABSORPTION RESULTING FROM<br />

GAMMA RADIATION INCIDENT ON A<br />

MULTIREGION SHIELD WITH<br />

SLAB GEOMETRY<br />

S. Auslender3<br />

The code for a Monte Carlo calculation of energy<br />

deposition in a multiregion shield with slab<br />

geometry4 has been used to obtain <strong>the</strong> results for<br />

1-Mev gamma rays incident on a slab consisting of<br />

regions of fuel, Inconel, sodium, and Inconel again.<br />

A diagram of <strong>the</strong> composite slab is shown in Fig.<br />

5.1.1, which gives <strong>the</strong> normal thicknesses in<br />

30n assignment from Pratt & Whitney Aircraft.<br />

4S. Auslender, ANP Quar. Prog. Rep. March 10, 1956,<br />

<strong>ORNL</strong>-2061, p 223.<br />

c<br />

r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!