ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANP PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT<br />
ot(E) = microscopic total cross section<br />
at energy E, cm2,<br />
ot(Eo) = microscopic total cross section<br />
at energy, E,, cm2,<br />
9 9<br />
X = scalar distance from source<br />
point measured in units of mean<br />
free path at energy E,,<br />
+<br />
X = position vector from source<br />
point,<br />
f(E,Q,E ',a ') = scattering kernel,<br />
+ +<br />
G(A,E,Q) = particle current, particles per<br />
unit energy at energy E per unit<br />
solid angle in <strong>the</strong> direction 6per<br />
. square mean free path (at energy<br />
. E,) at position A,<br />
+<br />
S(E,Q) = source strength, particles per<br />
unit energy at energy E fer unit<br />
solid angle in direction Q.<br />
Equation 1 is independent of <strong>the</strong> nuclear density<br />
thus G(A,E,H) is also inde-<br />
This means that if two ex-<br />
periments are set up with <strong>the</strong> same point source<br />
but with different densities p1 and p2 and ttie<br />
current is measured in each experiment at positions<br />
such that<br />
<strong>the</strong>n<br />
(3)<br />
The significance of Eg. 3 can be realized if hand<br />
G are reduced to conventional units. The relation<br />
between distance r (measured in centimeters) and<br />
X is given by<br />
9 9<br />
(4) h = No,(E,)r ,<br />
where N is <strong>the</strong> nuclear density of <strong>the</strong> medium. The<br />
conventional particle current can be defined as<br />
F(?,E,~) given in particles per unit energy at<br />
energy E per unit solid angle in direction 6 per<br />
cm2 at position r. The relation between F and G<br />
is <strong>the</strong>n<br />
266<br />
By using Eq. 4, Eq. 2 becomes<br />
9 Nl 9 p1 9<br />
r2 =- r1 = - r1<br />
N2 p2<br />
and by using Eq. 5, Eq. 3 becomes<br />
which is <strong>the</strong> desired transformation. Proper inte-<br />
gration of Eq. 7 gives <strong>the</strong> flux transformation.as<br />
and <strong>the</strong> dose rate transformation as<br />
These transformations can be applied to much of<br />
<strong>the</strong> TSF data, but <strong>the</strong> application is not entirely<br />
general.2 To make full use of <strong>the</strong> transformations<br />
it will be necessary to obtain additional data at<br />
<strong>the</strong> TSF at several separation distances so that<br />
<strong>the</strong> measurements can be interpolated and applied<br />
at any altitude.<br />
ENERGY ABSORPTION RESULTING FROM<br />
GAMMA RADIATION INCIDENT ON A<br />
MULTIREGION SHIELD WITH<br />
SLAB GEOMETRY<br />
S. Auslender3<br />
The code for a Monte Carlo calculation of energy<br />
deposition in a multiregion shield with slab<br />
geometry4 has been used to obtain <strong>the</strong> results for<br />
1-Mev gamma rays incident on a slab consisting of<br />
regions of fuel, Inconel, sodium, and Inconel again.<br />
A diagram of <strong>the</strong> composite slab is shown in Fig.<br />
5.1.1, which gives <strong>the</strong> normal thicknesses in<br />
30n assignment from Pratt & Whitney Aircraft.<br />
4S. Auslender, ANP Quar. Prog. Rep. March 10, 1956,<br />
<strong>ORNL</strong>-2061, p 223.<br />
c<br />
r