05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6,<br />

*<br />

c<br />

L<br />

.<br />

c<br />

e<br />

4<br />

gi<br />

depths greater than <strong>the</strong> background dimensional<br />

variations in <strong>the</strong> tube,<br />

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF TUBING<br />

R. W. McClung<br />

Approximately 6000 ft of Cx-900 lnconel tubing<br />

has been inspected by <strong>the</strong> immersed ultrasound<br />

method. Two sizes of tubing 3/ in. OD, 0.025 in.<br />

'4<br />

wall and 0.229 in. OD, 0.025 in. wall, were inspected<br />

and <strong>the</strong> average rejection by this test<br />

was about 2%. Each tube received a double inspection,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> ultrasound being beamed around<br />

<strong>the</strong> tube in two different directions to improve <strong>the</strong><br />

chance of detection of unfavorably oriented cracklike<br />

defects. This double inspection of <strong>the</strong> precut<br />

tubing reduced <strong>the</strong> inspection rate to below <strong>the</strong><br />

original estimate. The current inspection rate is<br />

approximately 500 ft in an 8-hr day for lengths<br />

up to 10 ft.<br />

Defects 0.0015 in. deep and b6 in. long on<br />

polished, scratch-free tubing can be detected with<br />

PERIOD ENDING JUNE 10, 1956<br />

'an estimated confidence of 80 to 90%. If scratches<br />

are present <strong>the</strong>y will produce signals comparable<br />

to those from <strong>the</strong> very small defects and effectively<br />

increase <strong>the</strong> minimum detectable defect size. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> defect is appreciably deeper than <strong>the</strong> scratches<br />

and if its length exceeds <strong>the</strong> maximum dimension<br />

of <strong>the</strong> transducer, it is not difficult to differentiate<br />

between defects and scratches. Since <strong>the</strong> ultrasonic<br />

method is insensitive to dimensions, <strong>the</strong><br />

inherent dimensional variations that give trouble<br />

in an eddy-current inspection have no effect on<br />

ultrasonic inspection. Both <strong>the</strong> eddy-current and<br />

<strong>the</strong> ultrasonic methods are capable of detecting<br />

very small defects, with <strong>the</strong> eddy-current inspection<br />

being confused by dimensional variations and<br />

<strong>the</strong> ultrasound method being confused by scratches.<br />

A comparison of <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> two tests aids<br />

in <strong>the</strong> identification of spurious signals.<br />

A typical small defect found on <strong>the</strong> inside of<br />

<strong>the</strong> $,-in.-OD, 0.025-in.-wall CS-900 tubing is<br />

shown in Fig. 3.7.2. This crack is 0.0015 in.<br />

deep (6%) and about t6 in. long.<br />

Fig. 3.7.2. Small Defect Found by Ultrasonic Inspection on <strong>the</strong> Inner Surface of a 3/,6-in.pOD,<br />

0.025-in.-Wall Inconel Tube. The defect is 0.0015 in. deep and gpproximately t6 in. long,<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!