ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6,<br />
*<br />
c<br />
L<br />
.<br />
c<br />
e<br />
4<br />
gi<br />
depths greater than <strong>the</strong> background dimensional<br />
variations in <strong>the</strong> tube,<br />
ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF TUBING<br />
R. W. McClung<br />
Approximately 6000 ft of Cx-900 lnconel tubing<br />
has been inspected by <strong>the</strong> immersed ultrasound<br />
method. Two sizes of tubing 3/ in. OD, 0.025 in.<br />
'4<br />
wall and 0.229 in. OD, 0.025 in. wall, were inspected<br />
and <strong>the</strong> average rejection by this test<br />
was about 2%. Each tube received a double inspection,<br />
with <strong>the</strong> ultrasound being beamed around<br />
<strong>the</strong> tube in two different directions to improve <strong>the</strong><br />
chance of detection of unfavorably oriented cracklike<br />
defects. This double inspection of <strong>the</strong> precut<br />
tubing reduced <strong>the</strong> inspection rate to below <strong>the</strong><br />
original estimate. The current inspection rate is<br />
approximately 500 ft in an 8-hr day for lengths<br />
up to 10 ft.<br />
Defects 0.0015 in. deep and b6 in. long on<br />
polished, scratch-free tubing can be detected with<br />
PERIOD ENDING JUNE 10, 1956<br />
'an estimated confidence of 80 to 90%. If scratches<br />
are present <strong>the</strong>y will produce signals comparable<br />
to those from <strong>the</strong> very small defects and effectively<br />
increase <strong>the</strong> minimum detectable defect size. If<br />
<strong>the</strong> defect is appreciably deeper than <strong>the</strong> scratches<br />
and if its length exceeds <strong>the</strong> maximum dimension<br />
of <strong>the</strong> transducer, it is not difficult to differentiate<br />
between defects and scratches. Since <strong>the</strong> ultrasonic<br />
method is insensitive to dimensions, <strong>the</strong><br />
inherent dimensional variations that give trouble<br />
in an eddy-current inspection have no effect on<br />
ultrasonic inspection. Both <strong>the</strong> eddy-current and<br />
<strong>the</strong> ultrasonic methods are capable of detecting<br />
very small defects, with <strong>the</strong> eddy-current inspection<br />
being confused by dimensional variations and<br />
<strong>the</strong> ultrasound method being confused by scratches.<br />
A comparison of <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> two tests aids<br />
in <strong>the</strong> identification of spurious signals.<br />
A typical small defect found on <strong>the</strong> inside of<br />
<strong>the</strong> $,-in.-OD, 0.025-in.-wall CS-900 tubing is<br />
shown in Fig. 3.7.2. This crack is 0.0015 in.<br />
deep (6%) and about t6 in. long.<br />
Fig. 3.7.2. Small Defect Found by Ultrasonic Inspection on <strong>the</strong> Inner Surface of a 3/,6-in.pOD,<br />
0.025-in.-Wall Inconel Tube. The defect is 0.0015 in. deep and gpproximately t6 in. long,<br />
215