05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-2106 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANP PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT<br />

final passes, and micrometer measurements were<br />

taken after <strong>the</strong> final pass had been made. The<br />

shrinkage measurements and welding data are<br />

presented in Table 3.4.5; <strong>the</strong> results of tests la,<br />

107, 108, and 109 were in close agreement,<br />

although two different welding operators made <strong>the</strong><br />

welds.<br />

The welding procedure used for <strong>the</strong>se tests of<br />

plates was <strong>the</strong>n used for test welds of hoops.<br />

For <strong>the</strong>se tests ?' . lnconel plates, 6 x 138 in.,<br />

were bent into tin oops approximately 44 in. in<br />

diameter. One edge of each hoop had a 50-deg<br />

bevel and a t6-in. land. The hoops were placed<br />

on <strong>the</strong> weld-positioner bed in a horizontal plane<br />

in <strong>the</strong> manner shown in Fig. 3.4.16. Tool-steel<br />

spacers, 4 in. long and \ in. thick,-shown in<br />

Fig. 3.4.17, were placed between <strong>the</strong> beveled<br />

edges at 6-in. intervals to maintain <strong>the</strong> root gap.<br />

Large C-clamps were used to draw <strong>the</strong> two hoops<br />

tightly against <strong>the</strong> spacers. Smaller C-clamps<br />

were halved and tacked to <strong>the</strong> bottom hoops to<br />

aid in <strong>the</strong> alignment of <strong>the</strong> upper hoop. Asbestos<br />

string was used to seal <strong>the</strong> gaps between <strong>the</strong><br />

spacers prior to tacking. The area behind <strong>the</strong><br />

root gap was sealed with a cover formed from<br />

0.010-in. annealed brass sheet and masking tape,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> enclosed space was purged for 30 min<br />

prior to tacking, Alignment was checked con- -<br />

stantly as -<strong>the</strong> tack welds were placed between<br />

<strong>the</strong> spacers. After removal of <strong>the</strong> tool-steel<br />

spacers, <strong>the</strong> root pass was deposited. No dressing<br />

of <strong>the</strong> land or fea<strong>the</strong>ring of <strong>the</strong> tack welds was<br />

permitted prior to <strong>the</strong> root-pass deposition.<br />

After completion of <strong>the</strong> root pass, <strong>the</strong> weld was<br />

wire brushed and <strong>the</strong> five final weld passes were<br />

deposited by using <strong>the</strong> sequence described in<br />

Fig. 3.4.14. For <strong>the</strong>se welds, two welders worked<br />

180-deg apart around <strong>the</strong> hoop while <strong>the</strong> positioner<br />

was slowly rotated. As shown in Fig. 3.4.18,<br />

four dial gages were used to record <strong>the</strong> shrinkages<br />

of <strong>the</strong> final passes. The welders worked on a<br />

15-min-work, 5-min-rest cycle. A typical plot of<br />

dial-gage readings is shown in Fig. 3.4.19. The<br />

micrometer and dial-gage measurements obtained<br />

are summarized in Table 3.4.6.<br />

TABLE 3.45. WELDING CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF SHRINKAGE MEASUREMENTS<br />

ON WELDS OF INCONEL PLATE<br />

Test Welder Time Welding Current Total Shrinkage (in,) Diol-Gage Shrinkage' (in.)<br />

No. No.<br />

Required<br />

(min)<br />

Rad Used<br />

(in.)<br />

Used<br />

(amp)<br />

Maximum Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Average<br />

100 1<br />

101 1<br />

102t' 1<br />

106 1<br />

107 1<br />

108 2<br />

109 2<br />

72<br />

66<br />

74<br />

61<br />

60<br />

79<br />

64<br />

213.5 70 (root) 0.1 97<br />

105-110<br />

231 70 (root) 0.1 67<br />

1 05-1 10<br />

180 80 (root) 0.1 42<br />

105-110<br />

198 80 (root) 0.157<br />

105-1 10<br />

226 75-80 (root) 0.148<br />

105-1 10<br />

231 80 (root) 0.157<br />

1 05- 1 1 0<br />

236 80 (root) 0.1 54<br />

105-1 10<br />

0.123 0.126 0.058 0.048<br />

0.130 0.146 0.070 0.050<br />

0.114 0.130 0.081 0.079<br />

0.121 0.141 0.092 0.082<br />

0.132 0.139 0.104 0.096<br />

0.106 0.138 0.103 0.093<br />

0.104 0.136 0.102 0.092<br />

*Measurements made on last five of <strong>the</strong> six passes;dial-goge readings on tests 100 and 101 are erroneous because<br />

<strong>the</strong> dial-gage actuating arm slipped during <strong>the</strong> test.<br />

188<br />

**Test 102 plates were machined with an 80-deg included angle ra<strong>the</strong>r thon a 100-deg included angle.<br />

0.053<br />

0.060<br />

0.080<br />

0.087<br />

0.1 00<br />

0.098<br />

0.097<br />

s<br />

.<br />

c<br />

*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!