05.08.2013 Views

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Goldstein et al, (Reference 4.9) utilizes linear equations for the in-<br />

plane motion only <strong>and</strong> describes a procedure for obtaining the optimum thrusting<br />

<strong>and</strong> steering program. The problem is formulated as a Mayer problem in the<br />

calculus of variations <strong>and</strong> the switching function is developed. A sequence<br />

of thrusting programs is then constructed <strong>and</strong> developed in such a way as to<br />

approach that one which satisfies the maximizing conditions. Computational'<br />

results for a series of cases are given <strong>and</strong> these will be summarized below.<br />

The analysis to be presented is similar to that of Paiewonsky <strong>and</strong> Woodrow.<br />

In this case, the full set of equations for the circular reference orbit is<br />

used because the function to be minimized involves all three thr,ust directions,<br />

that is, Equation 4.1 is used. In addition, both the time optimal <strong>and</strong> fuel<br />

optimal rendezvous problems are developed. Much of the analysis is common<br />

to the two procedures; therefore, these discussions will be carried together<br />

until it finally becomes necessary to distinguish one problem from the other.<br />

These two problems are in fact very similar to the time <strong>and</strong> fuel optimal or-<br />

bit transfer problems which are described by McIntyre (Ref. 4.12, Section<br />

2.3.4, pages 61-68) as illustrations of the Pontryagin Maximum Principle.<br />

The differences between rendezvous <strong>and</strong> transfer problems are: first, that<br />

for the three dimensional transfer problem only five variables corresponding<br />

to some set of five distinct orbital elements have to be matched at the end,<br />

whereas for rendezvous six variables are needed so that the final position<br />

on the target orbit matches a given phase situation; <strong>and</strong> second, that the<br />

transfer problem is extremely non-linear while the differential equations<br />

for the present problem are linear with constant coefficients.<br />

In order to attack either of these two problems in three dimensions, it<br />

is necessary to combine the differential equations of motion <strong>and</strong> one for a<br />

measure of fuel consumption into a set of seven linear differential equations.<br />

The equations of motion were integrated in section 2.1.4.1 as follows: to<br />

begin with, the differential equations of motion are: (Eq. 1.21).<br />

where the els are distances expressed in units of the radius of the circular<br />

reference orbit; the independent variable, 8, can be taken as the true<br />

anomaly or the mean anomaly in radians (time in units of the time for the<br />

reference particle to move one radian around its orbit); <strong>and</strong> ui are the<br />

forces/unit mass in units of the acceleration of gravity at the reference<br />

orbit.<br />

The variables (51; 32, r; si 53, s; >= 'rT were transformed<br />

to WT according to Eq. 1.59 <strong>and</strong> thi sol&on was obtained as (Eq. 1.64) as<br />

4.10<br />

w = F (Q) (w 0 - z) 4.l-l<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!