guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization
guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization
guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
time the vehicle crosses the desired plane. This cost is<br />
For the finite thrust case of (m+l) intervals of acceleration (u3) <strong>and</strong><br />
duration @,-the cost is<br />
This technique is shown to satisfy the Pontryagin Maximum Principle by the<br />
development of the switching function.<br />
For the in-plane motion Tschauner <strong>and</strong> Hempel point out that<br />
This equation shows that 7, (0) is a lower limit for the velocity increment<br />
needed, <strong>and</strong> that this minimum can be reached only if there is no radial thrust<br />
<strong>and</strong> the circumferential thrust does not involve a change in direction. On<br />
the basis of this argument, ul is set = 0 <strong>and</strong> the problem is reduced to a<br />
one dimensional motion.<br />
The condition that ~2 does not suffer a change in direction is known<br />
to occur when the two orbits do not intersect, since for this case optimum<br />
impulsive transfer is very nearly cotangential, <strong>and</strong> the angular momentum is<br />
increased by both burns (the active vehicle is assumed to be in the orbit<br />
closer to the force center). Tschauner <strong>and</strong> Hempel proceed to develop cri-<br />
teria <strong>and</strong> equations for a three burn maneuver of the form shown in Figure 4.1.<br />
-<br />
CIRCuM. -R - - @2 -<br />
ACCEL.<br />
1 J<br />
Figure 4.1. Three-Burn Maneuver to Rendezvous<br />
59<br />
4.3<br />
4.4