05.08.2013 Views

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

guidance, flight mechanics and trajectory optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2.1.1 Manual Rendezvous Guidance<br />

The technique of fixing the direction of the line of sight in inertial<br />

space effectively uncouples the linear <strong>and</strong> angular motion <strong>and</strong> reduces the<br />

problem to one dimension. This feature is a particularly useful in the case<br />

where a pilot is manually performing the rendezvous. Such a system is con-<br />

sidered as a back-up for the Gemini missions (Reference 2.3); for the Gemini<br />

scheme, the pilot visually observes the relative motion between the spacecraft<br />

<strong>and</strong> the target vehicle with respect to a star background. Range <strong>and</strong> range-<br />

rate information are provided by radar or optical means. When the two ve-<br />

hicles are within a preselected distance, the pilot initiates a thrust<br />

maneuver normal to the line of sight until he observes that the relative<br />

(angular) motion has been eliminated. This process is continued throughout<br />

the rendezvous whenever relative motion is again noticed. The range <strong>and</strong><br />

rate range are monitored so that the time to begin the braking maneuver can<br />

be determined.<br />

2.2.1.2 Separation of Guidance-Navigation Tasks<br />

In the previous section, the astronaut performing the rendezvous maneuver<br />

was required to navigate (i.e., determine when the relative motion has ceased)<br />

during periods of thrust application. A technique developed by Steffan<br />

(Reference 2.4) determines the time duration of the thrusting from data taken<br />

before thrust initiation. The angular rate of the LOS is allowed to oscillate<br />

between limits with the period of oscillation determined by thrusting in the<br />

LOS direction. This technique requires the application of several velocity<br />

increments normal to the LOS, the times of these applications are related to<br />

the period of the limit cycle <strong>and</strong> are controlled by controlling the range<br />

rate. The desired period of the limit cycle is then chosen so that the time<br />

between corrections is sufficient to allow for data taking <strong>and</strong> processing.<br />

This time will vary depending on how the data is being taken <strong>and</strong> processed,<br />

e.g., a range radar feeding information directly to a computer vs. optical<br />

measurements <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> calculations by an astronaut.<br />

By the use of the rocket motor normal to the LOS, the rendezvous ve-<br />

hicle is established on a collision course with the target vehicle such that<br />

the direction of the LOS is stabilized, to within some limits, in inertial<br />

space. The approximate behavior of this limit cycle can be determined<br />

analyzing the expressions for the angular rate of the LOS as a function of<br />

time for (1) termination of normal thrust <strong>and</strong> (2) time for the initiation of the<br />

normal thrust. First the case of no thrust is considered.<br />

A polar coordinate system will be used to describe the motion. In this<br />

system, the range (p) is defined as the distance from the rendezvous vehicle<br />

to the target vehicle; a' is measured from an inertial reference direction;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the origin of the coordinate system is at the target vehicle.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!