04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.7. IDEAL GAS IN FIRST APPROXIMATION. 63<br />

Our new condition is therefore th<strong>at</strong> the second term is small compared to the<br />

first term, or<br />

n<br />

| log(1 + ε)| ≪ | log( ) − 1| (3.112)<br />

nQ(T )<br />

We now take the same requirement as in the one particle case, and assume<br />

th<strong>at</strong><br />

n ≪ nQ(T ) (3.113)<br />

which also implies V nQ(T ) ≫ N or ε ≪ 1. This means th<strong>at</strong> the left hand side<br />

of 3.112 is much smaller than one. Since the right hand side is much larger<br />

than one (note the absolute sign, the logarithm itself is large and neg<strong>at</strong>ive!), the<br />

Helmholtz free energy is indeed approxim<strong>at</strong>ed by the formula we gave.<br />

The inequality n ≪ nQ(T ) inspired the name quantum concentr<strong>at</strong>ion. If<br />

the concentr<strong>at</strong>ion is comparable to or larger than the quantum concentr<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

we have to use the series. Also, <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> point quantum effects like the Pauli<br />

principle will start to play a role. If the condition above is fulfilled, we are in<br />

the classical limit<br />

Hence everything seems OK. But there might be one last objection. We<br />

need to take deriv<strong>at</strong>ives of the free energy, and is the deriv<strong>at</strong>ive of the error<br />

term small? The two terms in the free energy are:<br />

<br />

<br />

n<br />

Fideal = −NkBT log( ) − 1<br />

(3.114)<br />

nQ(T )<br />

and<br />

1 −<br />

Ftrunc = −NkBT ε = −NkBT f(V, T )(V nQ(T )) 3 (3.115)<br />

where f(V, T ) is some function of order one. As an example, we take the deriv<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

with respect to V, in order to get the pressure. The ideal gas result is<br />

NkBT<br />

V , and the deriv<strong>at</strong>ive of the trunc<strong>at</strong>ion error in the free energy has two<br />

terms. One part comes from the last factor, and gives<br />

1 NkBT<br />

1 −<br />

f(V, T )(V nQ(T )) 3 (3.116)<br />

3 V<br />

which is again small if V nQ(T ) ≫ N. The second part gives<br />

− NkBT<br />

<br />

∂f<br />

V (V, T )<br />

V ∂V<br />

T<br />

1 −<br />

(V nQ(T )) 3 (3.117)<br />

and could be large if f(V, T ) is an oscill<strong>at</strong>ing function. This is fortun<strong>at</strong>ely not<br />

the case. Formula 3.89 tells us th<strong>at</strong> f(V, T ) is equal to − 1<br />

2 plus terms th<strong>at</strong> are<br />

exponentially small. The first part gives zero deriv<strong>at</strong>ives, and the second part<br />

gives deriv<strong>at</strong>ives which are exponentially small.<br />

The error analysis above is typical for fundamental questions in st<strong>at</strong>istical<br />

mechanics. In many cases it is ignored, and often without consequences. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!