04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 CHAPTER 3. VARIABLE NUMBER OF PARTICLES<br />

variables U = T S + µN (Gibbs-Duhem), and hence Ω = 0. Also, T = <br />

∂U<br />

∂S N<br />

which is zero according to the formula U = Nω. Wh<strong>at</strong> went wrong?<br />

There are two problems. First of all, in a T,S,µ ,N system we cannot choose<br />

T and µ as independent variables in thermodynamics. We have to introduce an<br />

extensive parameter. Second, we have to take the thermodynamic limit. The<br />

formula for N can be inverted to yield a formula for µ:<br />

µ = ω − kBT log(1 + 1<br />

) (3.82)<br />

N<br />

which tells us th<strong>at</strong> for a given value of N the chemical potential and the temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

are rel<strong>at</strong>ed. In the thermodynamic limit N → ∞ we find µ = ω. For<br />

this value of the chemical potential the series for the grand partition function<br />

does not converge anymore, hence we have to perform all calcul<strong>at</strong>ions for finite<br />

values of N and take the limit only in the end. The grand potential per particle<br />

is<br />

Ω(T, N)<br />

N<br />

= −kBT<br />

log(N + 1)<br />

N<br />

(3.83)<br />

and this quantity is zero in the thermodynamic limit. Hence we retrieved the<br />

result anticip<strong>at</strong>ed from thermodynamics. We also find<br />

S(T, N) = kB log(N + 1) + NkB log(1 + 1<br />

) (3.84)<br />

N<br />

which shows th<strong>at</strong> in the thermodynamic limit S<br />

N = 0. In other words, temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

is not well-defined for this system. This problem is independent of the<br />

thermodynamic limit, but is inherent to our simple model where we use only<br />

one quantum number for both energy and number of particles. For a given<br />

number of particles the energy is fixed! Hence we really only have two independent<br />

variables in our system and thermodynamically our system is completely<br />

characterized once we know the value of N. In realistic physical models the parameters<br />

N and U have to be independent. An example is found in the next<br />

section.<br />

3.7 Ideal gas in first approxim<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The ideal gas is the first realistic and complete model we encounter. There are<br />

three sets of thermodynamic variables. We have volume and pressure, entropy<br />

and temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and chemical potential and number of particles. Therefore,<br />

we can choose T and µ independently, after which the value of p is fixed.<br />

In the original experiments with a gas as a function of pressure, volume,<br />

and temper<strong>at</strong>ure it was noted th<strong>at</strong> the rel<strong>at</strong>ions between these thermodynamic<br />

quantities were very similar for many different gases. Therefore, one postul<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

the so-called ideal gas laws and tried to explain why a real gas shows small (or<br />

large) differences from these ideal gas laws. Of course, we now know th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

most important parameter for ideal gas behavior is the density n = N<br />

V

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!