04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 CHAPTER 3. VARIABLE NUMBER OF PARTICLES<br />

where in the last case (which we did not discuss here) the volume of the st<strong>at</strong>e<br />

is vs. This last formul<strong>at</strong>ion is only included for completeness, and to show how<br />

other transform<strong>at</strong>ions are made. The argument of the exponent in the sum is<br />

easy to find if we think about the free energies th<strong>at</strong> are used in the situ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

above. In the first case it is F, in the second case Ω = F − µN, and in the last<br />

case G = F + pV . The rel<strong>at</strong>ions with the free energy follow from:<br />

F (T, V, N) = −kBT log(Z(T, V, N)) (3.65)<br />

Ω(T, V, µ) = −kBT log(Z(T, V, µ)) (3.66)<br />

G(T, p, N) = −kBT log(ζ(T, p, N)) (3.67)<br />

or in exponential form, which resembles the sum in the partition functions,<br />

−βF (T,V,N)<br />

Z(T, V, N) = e<br />

Z(T, V, µ) = e −βΩ(T,V,µ)<br />

−βF (T,p,N)<br />

ζ(T, p, N) = e<br />

(3.68)<br />

(3.69)<br />

(3.70)<br />

Once we have the free energies, we can revert to thermodynamics. We<br />

can also do more calcul<strong>at</strong>ions in st<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics, using the fact th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

probability of finding a st<strong>at</strong>e is always the exponential factor in the sum divided<br />

by the sum. This is a generaliz<strong>at</strong>ion of the Boltzmann factor. We can then<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>e fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions, and show th<strong>at</strong> certain response functions are rel<strong>at</strong>ed to<br />

fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions. For example, we would find:<br />

(∆V ) 2 <br />

∂V<br />

= kBT<br />

(3.71)<br />

∂p<br />

The example with changing V to p is a bit contrived, but shows the general<br />

principle. A practical example involves magnetic systems, where we can either<br />

use the total magnetiz<strong>at</strong>ion M of the applied field H as an independent variable.<br />

There we would have:<br />

or<br />

Z(T, V, N, M) =<br />

Z(T, V, N, H) = <br />

<br />

s∈S(V,N,M)<br />

s∈S(V,N)<br />

T,N<br />

e −βɛs −βF (T,V,N,M)<br />

= e<br />

e −β(ɛs−Hms) = e −βG(T,V,N,H)<br />

(3.72)<br />

(3.73)<br />

where G is a generalized form of a Gibbs energy. We have used the same symbol<br />

for the partition function (sorry, I could not find a new and better one). This<br />

is also very commonly done in the liter<strong>at</strong>ure. Fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions follow from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!