04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 CHAPTER 2. THE CANONICAL ENSEMBLE<br />

Another subtle point is th<strong>at</strong> here we defined pressure via p = − ∂ɛs<br />

∂V N .<br />

This is a definition in a microscopic sense, and is the direct analogue of wh<strong>at</strong><br />

we would expect based on macroscopic consider<strong>at</strong>ions. Because we derive the<br />

same work term as in thermodynamics, this microscopic definition is equivalent<br />

to the macroscopic, thermodynamic one.<br />

Very, very simple model.<br />

An example of a process outlined above is the following. This model is much<br />

too simple, though, and should not be taken too serious. Assume th<strong>at</strong> the energy<br />

eigenvalues of our system depend on volume according to ɛs(V ) = ɛs(V0) V<br />

V0 .<br />

During the process of changing the volume we also change the temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

and for each volume set the temper<strong>at</strong>ure by T (V ) = T0 V . In this case the<br />

V0<br />

probabilities are clearly unchanged because the r<strong>at</strong>io ɛs<br />

T is constant. Hence in<br />

this very simple model we can describe exactly how the temper<strong>at</strong>ure will have<br />

to change with volume when the entropy is constant. The energy is given by<br />

U(V, T (V )) = ɛs(V )P (s) = V<br />

V0 U0(T0) and hence the pressure is p = − U0<br />

V0 .<br />

This is neg<strong>at</strong>ive!<br />

Why this is too simple.<br />

The partition function in the previous example is given by<br />

and hence the internal energy is<br />

Z(T, V ) = sumse − V ɛs(V 0 )<br />

V 0 k B T = F ( V<br />

U = −kBV F ′ ( V<br />

T )<br />

F ( V<br />

T )<br />

) (2.28)<br />

T<br />

(2.29)<br />

Also, from the formula for the entropy 2.23 we see th<strong>at</strong> S = G( V<br />

T ) and combining<br />

this with the formula for energy we get<br />

U = V H(S) (2.30)<br />

which gives p = − U<br />

V and hence for the enthalpy H = U +pV = 0. This is exactly<br />

why this model is too simple. There are only two intensive st<strong>at</strong>e variables, and<br />

only one (T in this case) can be independent. We will need an extra dependence<br />

of the energy on another extensive st<strong>at</strong>e variable to construct a realistic system.<br />

The easiest way is to include N, the number of particles.<br />

In general, beware of simple models! They can be nice, because they allow<br />

for quick calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, and some conclusions are justified. In general, though,<br />

we need a dependence of the energy on <strong>at</strong> least two extensive st<strong>at</strong>e variables to<br />

obtain interesting results which are of practical importance.<br />

Very simple model, revised.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!