Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30 CHAPTER 2. THE CANONICAL ENSEMBLE<br />
Another subtle point is th<strong>at</strong> here we defined pressure via p = − ∂ɛs<br />
∂V N .<br />
This is a definition in a microscopic sense, and is the direct analogue of wh<strong>at</strong><br />
we would expect based on macroscopic consider<strong>at</strong>ions. Because we derive the<br />
same work term as in thermodynamics, this microscopic definition is equivalent<br />
to the macroscopic, thermodynamic one.<br />
Very, very simple model.<br />
An example of a process outlined above is the following. This model is much<br />
too simple, though, and should not be taken too serious. Assume th<strong>at</strong> the energy<br />
eigenvalues of our system depend on volume according to ɛs(V ) = ɛs(V0) V<br />
V0 .<br />
During the process of changing the volume we also change the temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
and for each volume set the temper<strong>at</strong>ure by T (V ) = T0 V . In this case the<br />
V0<br />
probabilities are clearly unchanged because the r<strong>at</strong>io ɛs<br />
T is constant. Hence in<br />
this very simple model we can describe exactly how the temper<strong>at</strong>ure will have<br />
to change with volume when the entropy is constant. The energy is given by<br />
U(V, T (V )) = ɛs(V )P (s) = V<br />
V0 U0(T0) and hence the pressure is p = − U0<br />
V0 .<br />
This is neg<strong>at</strong>ive!<br />
Why this is too simple.<br />
The partition function in the previous example is given by<br />
and hence the internal energy is<br />
Z(T, V ) = sumse − V ɛs(V 0 )<br />
V 0 k B T = F ( V<br />
U = −kBV F ′ ( V<br />
T )<br />
F ( V<br />
T )<br />
) (2.28)<br />
T<br />
(2.29)<br />
Also, from the formula for the entropy 2.23 we see th<strong>at</strong> S = G( V<br />
T ) and combining<br />
this with the formula for energy we get<br />
U = V H(S) (2.30)<br />
which gives p = − U<br />
V and hence for the enthalpy H = U +pV = 0. This is exactly<br />
why this model is too simple. There are only two intensive st<strong>at</strong>e variables, and<br />
only one (T in this case) can be independent. We will need an extra dependence<br />
of the energy on another extensive st<strong>at</strong>e variable to construct a realistic system.<br />
The easiest way is to include N, the number of particles.<br />
In general, beware of simple models! They can be nice, because they allow<br />
for quick calcul<strong>at</strong>ions, and some conclusions are justified. In general, though,<br />
we need a dependence of the energy on <strong>at</strong> least two extensive st<strong>at</strong>e variables to<br />
obtain interesting results which are of practical importance.<br />
Very simple model, revised.