04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 CHAPTER 2. THE CANONICAL ENSEMBLE<br />

Reservoirs are wh<strong>at</strong> we need!<br />

The theoretical way to specify temper<strong>at</strong>ure is similar to the experimental setup.<br />

We assume th<strong>at</strong> the system S is in contact with and in thermal equilibrium<br />

with a very large reservoir R with temper<strong>at</strong>ure T. Only he<strong>at</strong> can flow back and<br />

forth between R and S. Volumes do not change, and no work is done between<br />

the system and the reservoir. The number of particles in the reservoir is NR<br />

and is much larger than the number of particles in the system NS. How much<br />

larger?? In thermal equilibrium the fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions of the energy per particle in<br />

the reservoir are<br />

∆UR<br />

NR<br />

∝ 1<br />

√ NR<br />

or with UR = ɛRNR we can write this in the form ∆UR = ɛR<br />

the maximum energy of the system is US = NSɛS. If we demand th<strong>at</strong><br />

NR ≫ N 2 S(ɛS/ɛR) 2<br />

(2.1)<br />

√ NR. Suppose<br />

(2.2)<br />

the system can take all of its energy from the reservoir without noticeably<br />

changing the st<strong>at</strong>e of the reservoir! In this case it is really allowed to assume th<strong>at</strong><br />

the reservoir is <strong>at</strong> a constant temper<strong>at</strong>ure. In practice, this leads to impossibly<br />

large reservoir sizes, but in theory th<strong>at</strong> is, of course, not a problem. For example,<br />

if we assume th<strong>at</strong> a typical reservoir has 10 24 particles, we could only consider<br />

systems of about 10 12 particles. This is too small. In reality, therefore, reservoirs<br />

do lead to finite size effects. These effects are very hard to calcul<strong>at</strong>e, and depend<br />

on the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the reservoir. We will therefore ignore them, and assume th<strong>at</strong><br />

the reservoirs are very large, and th<strong>at</strong> their only effect is to set the temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

Probabilities.<br />

We will now address the question: wh<strong>at</strong> is the probability of finding<br />

the system S in a unique quantum st<strong>at</strong>e s if it is in thermal equilibrium<br />

with a reservoir <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure T? The energy U0 of the total<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion, system plus reservoir, cannot change. Hence if the system is in<br />

a st<strong>at</strong>e s with energy ɛs, the reservoir has to have energy U0 − ɛs. The total<br />

number of st<strong>at</strong>es available in this configur<strong>at</strong>ion for the combin<strong>at</strong>ion of system<br />

and reservoir is gR(U0 − ɛs). This does not depend on the multiplicity function<br />

of the system, since we specify the st<strong>at</strong>e of the system. The multiplicity function<br />

for the combined reservoir and system is<br />

gS+R(U0) = <br />

gR(U0 − ɛs) (2.3)<br />

s<br />

All st<strong>at</strong>es of the combin<strong>at</strong>ion of system and reservoir are equally probably,<br />

and hence the probability of finding the combin<strong>at</strong>ion system plus reservoir in<br />

the configur<strong>at</strong>ion with the system in st<strong>at</strong>e s is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!