04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 CHAPTER 1. FOUNDATION OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS.<br />

The last st<strong>at</strong>ement is intuitively correct. In equilibrium, any part of a magnet<br />

has the same partial magnetiz<strong>at</strong>ion as the whole magnet.<br />

Next, we approxim<strong>at</strong>e the form of the terms t(xA) in the case th<strong>at</strong> both<br />

NA/gg1 and NB/gg1. In th<strong>at</strong> case we can write<br />

t(xA) ≈ t(x)e − N A N<br />

2N B (xA−x) 2<br />

(1.48)<br />

which has the right value and curv<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>at</strong> the maximum. For large numbers of<br />

particles this form has a small rel<strong>at</strong>ive error when the value is large, and a large<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ive error when the value is very small (and hence does not m<strong>at</strong>ter). This is<br />

again one of those cases where we rely on the thermodynamic limit. <strong>St<strong>at</strong>istical</strong><br />

mechanics can be applied to small systems, but in such a case one cannot make<br />

a connection with thermodynamics.<br />

The value of the term is reduced by a factor e for a fluctu<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<br />

2NB<br />

δxA =<br />

(1.49)<br />

NAN<br />

For a given r<strong>at</strong>io of NA and NB this becomes very small in the limit N → ∞.<br />

Again, if system A is small, the rel<strong>at</strong>ive fluctu<strong>at</strong>ions in energy are large and one<br />

has to be careful in applying standard results of thermodynamics.<br />

We are now able to do the summ<strong>at</strong>ion over all terms:<br />

or<br />

<br />

g(N, x) ≈ t(x)<br />

g(N, x) = <br />

t(xA) ≈ t(x) <br />

xA<br />

xA<br />

e − N A N<br />

2N B (xA−x) 2<br />

NA<br />

dxA<br />

2 e− NAN 2N (xA−x)<br />

B 2<br />

= t(x) 1<br />

<br />

πNANB<br />

2 N<br />

(1.50)<br />

(1.51)<br />

Next, we use are familiar friends the logarithms again to get<br />

log(g(N, x)) ≈ log(t(x)) + log( 1<br />

<br />

πNANB<br />

) (1.52)<br />

2 N<br />

The first term on the right hand side contains terms proportional to N or NA,<br />

while the second term contains only the logarithm of such numbers. Therefore,<br />

in the thermodynamic limit we can ignore the last terms and we find th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

logarithm of the sum (or of g) is equal to the logarithm of the largest term!<br />

This might seem a surprising result, but it occurs in other places too. In a<br />

m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ical sense, it is again connected with the law of large numbers.<br />

1.6 Entropy and temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

The st<strong>at</strong>ements in the previous section can be generalized for arbitrary systems.<br />

If two systems A and B, with multiplicity functions gA(N, U) and gB(N, U)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!