04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 CHAPTER 1. FOUNDATION OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS.<br />

almost identical to the subsystem <strong>at</strong> time t. In a sp<strong>at</strong>ial average, a change in a<br />

given subsystem is directly rel<strong>at</strong>ed to a change in the neighboring systems. The<br />

time average only approaches the ensemble average when we measure very long,<br />

or T → ∞. The sp<strong>at</strong>ial average only reduces to the ensemble average if we can<br />

divide the system in an infinite number of subsystems, which reduces the rel<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

effects of the correl<strong>at</strong>ion. This requires N → ∞. In the ensemble average<br />

we have to take L → ∞, but th<strong>at</strong> is not a problem for a theorist. The limit th<strong>at</strong><br />

the system becomes infinitely large is called the thermodynamic limit and is<br />

essential in a number of deriv<strong>at</strong>ions in thermodynamics. Keep in mind, though,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we still need an even larger outside world to justify the basic assumption!<br />

1.5 Thermal equilibrium.<br />

Isol<strong>at</strong>ed systems are not th<strong>at</strong> interesting. It is much more fun to take two<br />

systems and bring them in contact. Suppose we have two systems, A and B,<br />

which are in thermal contact. This means th<strong>at</strong> only energy can flow back and<br />

forth between them. The number of particles in each system is fixed. Also,<br />

each system does not perform work on the other. For example, there are no<br />

changes in volume. Energy can only exchange because of the interactions of<br />

the two systems across their common boundary. Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of energy tells us<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the total energy U of the combined system is constant. The big question<br />

is: wh<strong>at</strong> determines the energy flow between A and B and wh<strong>at</strong> is the<br />

condition for thermal equilibrium, e.g. no net energy flow. We invoke our basic<br />

assumption and note th<strong>at</strong> all accessible st<strong>at</strong>es of the total system are equally<br />

probable. A configur<strong>at</strong>ion of the total system is specified by the distribution of<br />

energy over A and B, and hence by the value of UA ( since UB = U − UA and<br />

U is constant ). The most probable configur<strong>at</strong>ion, or most probable value of<br />

UA , corresponds to the configur<strong>at</strong>ion which has the largest number of st<strong>at</strong>es<br />

available. The energy UA of this most probably configur<strong>at</strong>ion will be well defined<br />

in the thermodynamic limit, since in th<strong>at</strong> case multiplicity functions become<br />

very sharp on a rel<strong>at</strong>ive scale.<br />

Explan<strong>at</strong>ion by example.<br />

As an example, consider the Ising model in the presence of a magnetic induction<br />

B. Since the number of particles does not vary, we will drop the reference<br />

to N in the multiplicity functions in this paragraph. It is easy to show th<strong>at</strong><br />

U = − <br />

siµ · B = −Mµ · B = −xNµ · B (1.38)<br />

i<br />

The energy of subsystem A is UA = −xANAµ · B and of subsystem B is UB =<br />

−xBNBµ · B. Because energy is conserved we have xN = xANA + xBNB<br />

and therefore the total rel<strong>at</strong>ive magnetiz<strong>at</strong>ion x is the average of the values of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!