Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
224 CHAPTER 9. GENERAL METHODS: CRITICAL EXPONENTS.<br />
Note th<strong>at</strong> we cannot go any further in renormaliz<strong>at</strong>ion than to have one<br />
spin left. If <strong>at</strong> this point values are converged, fine, but if not, we see finite<br />
size effects. Only in the thermodynamic limit do we get a sharp transition<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure independent of the initial conditions. For a finite sample we always<br />
find a small range of fixed points.<br />
The applic<strong>at</strong>ion of renormaliz<strong>at</strong>ion theory to a one-dimensional problem is<br />
often straightforward because a one-dimensional space has a very simple topology.<br />
In more dimensions one has to deal with other complic<strong>at</strong>ions. For example,<br />
we could apply the same set of ideas to a two-dimensional Ising model. The sites<br />
are numbered (i, j) and the easiest geometry is th<strong>at</strong> of a square l<strong>at</strong>tice where<br />
the actual l<strong>at</strong>tice points are given by R = a(iˆx + j ˆy). We could try to sum first<br />
over all sites with i + j odd. The remaining sites with i + j even form again a<br />
square l<strong>at</strong>tice, but with l<strong>at</strong>tice constant a √ 2. Suppose we start with a model<br />
with only nearest-neighbor interactions. It is easy to see th<strong>at</strong> after one step in<br />
this renormaliz<strong>at</strong>ion procedure we have a system with nearest and next-nearest<br />
neighbor interactions! As a result we have to consider the Ising model with<br />
all interactions included and in the end find fixed points which correspond to<br />
nearest neighbor interactions only. Real life is not always as easy as the current<br />
section seemed to suggest. But if we do it correctly, we will find th<strong>at</strong> the twodimensional<br />
Ising model has a non-trivial fixed point even for h = 0. The value<br />
˜Jfp is rel<strong>at</strong>ed to Tc by ˜ Jfp = J<br />
kBTc .<br />
If renormaliz<strong>at</strong>ion theory would only give critical temper<strong>at</strong>ures, its value<br />
would be quite small. The most important aspect of this theory, however, is<br />
th<strong>at</strong> it also yields critical exponents. Suppose th<strong>at</strong> ˜ J ∗ and ˜ h ∗ are the values of<br />
the coupling parameters <strong>at</strong> a critical point. The critical exponents are rel<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
to the behavior of the renormaliz<strong>at</strong>ion group equ<strong>at</strong>ions near the critical point.<br />
Assume th<strong>at</strong> we are close to the critical point and th<strong>at</strong> we have ˜ J = ˜ J ∗ + δ ˜ J,<br />
˜h = ˜ h ∗ + δ ˜ h with δ ˜ J and δ ˜ h small. In first approxim<strong>at</strong>ion we use a linearized<br />
form, valid for small devi<strong>at</strong>ions, and we have<br />
and<br />
δ ˜ J ′ <br />
∂<br />
=<br />
˜ J ′<br />
∂ ˜ <br />
δ<br />
J<br />
˜ <br />
∂<br />
J +<br />
˜ J ′<br />
∂˜ <br />
δ<br />
h<br />
˜ h (9.172)<br />
δ˜ h ′ <br />
∂<br />
=<br />
˜ h ′<br />
∂ ˜ <br />
δ<br />
J<br />
˜ <br />
∂<br />
J +<br />
˜ h ′<br />
∂˜ <br />
δ<br />
h<br />
˜ h (9.173)<br />
where the partial deriv<strong>at</strong>ives are calcul<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> the fixed point.<br />
The devi<strong>at</strong>ions in the coupling constants from the fixed point are combined in<br />
a two-vector d. If we have more coupling constants, we have a larger dimensional<br />
space, so it is easy to generalize to include a larger number of coupling constants.<br />
Hence near a critical point we have<br />
d ′ = M d (9.174)