04.08.2013 Views

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

Statistical Mechanics - Physics at Oregon State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 CHAPTER 9. GENERAL METHODS: CRITICAL EXPONENTS.<br />

Z(N, ˜ J, ˜ h) = <br />

<br />

σ2,σ4,··· i odd<br />

e ˜ h( 1<br />

2 (σi−1+σi+1)) 2 cosh( ˜ J(σi−1 + σi+1) + ˜ h) (9.150)<br />

This looks like something for a partition function where only even spins play<br />

a role. On the right hand side we have exponential like things. Can we write<br />

this in a form<br />

Z(N, ˜ J, ˜ h) = <br />

e E(σ2,σ4,···)<br />

(9.151)<br />

σ2,σ4,···<br />

where the form of the energy is similar to the original energy? Clearly,<br />

the value of the coupling constant will be different, and also the zero of energy<br />

can be shifted. Therefore we try<br />

E(σ2, σ4, · · ·) = <br />

i odd<br />

<br />

2g + ˜ J ′ σi−1σi+1 + 1<br />

2 ˜ h ′ <br />

(σi−1 + σi+1)<br />

(9.152)<br />

The question is, is this possible, and if yes, wh<strong>at</strong> are the functions g( ˜ J, ˜ h) ,<br />

˜J ′ ( ˜ J, ˜ h) , and ˜ h ′ ( ˜ J, ˜ h).<br />

The answer whether it is possible can be given easily. Because we wrote<br />

the forms symmetric for interchanges of left and right, we need to consider only<br />

three combin<strong>at</strong>ions of neighboring even spins, (+, +) , (+, −) = (−, +) , and<br />

(−, −). Th<strong>at</strong> gives us three equ<strong>at</strong>ions, from which we can find three independent<br />

functions!<br />

The equ<strong>at</strong>ions to solve are<br />

(+, +) : e ˜ h 2 cosh(2 ˜ J + ˜ h) = e 2g+ ˜ J ′ + ˜ h ′<br />

(+, −) : 2 cosh( ˜ h) = e 2g− ˜ J ′<br />

(−, −) : e −˜ h 2 cosh(−2 ˜ J + ˜ h) = e 2g+ ˜ J ′ − ˜ h ′<br />

(9.153)<br />

(9.154)<br />

(9.155)<br />

The road to solving these is a bit tricky, but here is one approach. Multiply the<br />

first and the third, which gives<br />

4 cosh(2 ˜ J + ˜ h) cosh(−2 ˜ J + ˜ h) = e 4g+2 ˜ J ′<br />

Multiply by the square of the second equ<strong>at</strong>ion and we get<br />

16 cosh(2 ˜ J + ˜ h) cosh(−2 ˜ J + ˜ h) cosh 2 ( ˜ h) = e 8g<br />

(9.156)<br />

(9.157)<br />

which gives us g. We can also divide the product of the first and third by the<br />

square of the second, and now we find<br />

cosh(2 ˜ J + ˜ h) cosh(−2 ˜ J + ˜ h)<br />

cosh 2 ( ˜ = e<br />

h)<br />

4 ˜ J ′<br />

(9.158)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!